Obama's 2014 Amnesty

 By

Sampson Iroabuchi Onwuka

President Obama on November 20th, granted amnesty to several Americas living in the United States with merits of clean records and tax history, including a grant of temporary classing of these Immigrants whose joys are not well known, may be considered a high point but not a plateau in the classic drama on immigration. This is one his executive orders that will accompany his last days as President from understanding that the Republicans are ruling party at the Whitehouse. Such actions by the President are considered in the interest of the United States or at least in his own interest, do not fly from his political legacy. There are economic reasons also. The idea of sending 5 million illegal immigrants out of United States is shortage of labor in all areas of man and woman power which remote cities in US sourly needs. It does not mean that such concession on the needs of emigrants is material reasons for appropriating jobs set aside for all asunder and for general purpose, neither does it mean that social security privileges and Welfare benefit and Food Stamps are to be expected with assurance given the tightening of US budgetary requirement. Obviously the 5 million will contribute to the growth of these United States but to the extent that they understand the nature of the privilege offered to them as opposed to moral suasion of beating the system and penetrating its border. They can contribution to the society as a way to overcome their past. You are here simply put, because your old country is not better than this country.

More than once, American Presidents have exercised Amnesty with equal amount of consideration, some of which may be celebrated and others considered a political treat. If we can look at the historical prism of the Citizenship, rights of Citizenry, which the goggles of Roman example are artificial placement of natural rights higher than a non-citizens or Resident, it become common sense to argue that established societies or formidable empires with apian ways faced with many illegal migration of peoples of world into coveted realms, every so often add bit and pieces of their good gestures to rule by granting Amnesty to these migrants and to non-citizens living in their realms. For Rome, grant of Citizens and freedom characterized some of the high points in public service and duty, no less important is the official pontification of religious assignment. Here in the United States we defer on one’s religiosity either does it officially matter in choosing to stay here.

The difference lie elsewhere which is why the threats of eviction was not taken for granted and why certain concerns about emigration will not end with the permanence of papers. There will be arguments and fights over the actions by President Obama, but it will be a precedence that should not lead to blood. We may begin to perform procedure into Obama's physical speech with extensor ancillary to the time of Christ and head of the Catholic and Christian Churches, or with the migration of Mohammed into Jeddah from his home town, that the relapse on Obama’s speeches into the clutches on Bible makes a second departure from the current problems, itself a child of the process and second meaning, that the “Scripture tells us that we shall not oppress a stranger, for we know the heart of a stranger – we were strangers once, too.”, an onerous consideration that offers as much of necessity as the factor that others flirting under the canopy of presidential office would perhaps not have done similar such for the likes of him.

Sometimes these enacted procedural discovery of process leads to opening gates to Barbarians (a name measured and based in part on some African tribe), paved the ways for the conquest and failure of the state especially when allegation of infiltration and pejoration of pastoral penetration of the empire’s rear was considered Acts of War mingled as conquest strategy. But here, we doubt that the ambiguity of many Rome and one, is surpassing to the demands of the American et al, presence and domicile sovereignty, for it looks like the stories of these United States in comparative association with Rome, shows even the failure of the State to have granted Amnesty Peter and some of the disciples including a Roman Citizen such as Paul, did not stop the large scale revolution on citizenry initiated later by Caracalla son of the African emperor Septimus Severus. The US is not different, at least Obama – who is not different from others before him – may be hedging a new page by granting temporary work license to illegal emigrants, who are asked to be part of a larger family currently challenged by the past in the course of its future years.

If like Shakespeare we quote that ‘affections make (us) false’, the statement is difficult to digest given the presumed consideration of deporting emigrants in the nearer future by the salutary opponent's party, that future was injured by the direct actions of the President who may be looking to cast a weight political blanket on the Republican, whose opposition and controlling influence at the White House inveigh with meaning on a strategy taken for granted. From Obama’s speech, we read that. “…we are a nation of immigrants, we are also a nation of laws. Undocumented workers broke our immigration laws, and I believe that they must be held accountable – especially those who may be dangerous. That’s why, over the past six years, deportations of criminals are up 80 percent. And that’s why we’re going to keep focusing enforcement resources on actual threats to our security. Felons, not families. Criminals, not children. Gang members, not a mother who’s working hard to provide for her kids. We’ll prioritize, just like law enforcement does every day.” It meets with meaning that actions of that capacity have a staying power longer than meet its dividend. For statement of this weight no more than meaning, elevates the rhetoric to a new and possibly avenue. What binds the President to these emigrants? And why was he vouchsafed by the academic example of a leading student with illegal parents? Was it a dovetailing of his past and previous experience or was it a classic meter rendered to transform the new realities of political force which the Latin Americans have found in the Republican Party.?

Such painting of the livid core of the indwelling argument about the loyalties of the immigrants do not pale in comparison to the humble experiences of President Obama’s father who was accidently granted a chance to study abroad and was bested by the scholarship he inherited along with some other Africans through the political years of the late 50’s and 60’s in Africa. He is not saved by this singular experience in of itself, he is led to consider the merits of his actions in contest of enveloping new powers at the hands of the Republicans. Together and apart, the mingling of some of the basic assumptions about immigration and the legality which the President defended do not rain hard on why he took the actions in the interest of the country, do not reach high enough for those who manage our laws for us, for such actions to be taken beyond prima facia it may point to US defenses, who are currently leading a charge against Russia without inadvertently sousing an already sensitive injury. The war on immigration is not fought by US army, the mitigation of working for those who penetrated US borders is not initiated by US army, the protection of US borders against unwanted elements is literally the work of the experts; the military.

Perhaps we have to compensate some of his rhetoric with lively personal experience only to the extent that the problems of emigration to United States and the problems of ownership has managed from the late part of the last decade to re-appear in the United States. President Obama is therefore seething with permission on his political history, but from actions he opens himself to political daggers at the White House especially from the new meaning that Amnesty is not a give-away mirrored from the enterprise of executive decision, which literally bypassed the political roundtable meeting for such an exercise. Simply put, Obama acted in sole interest of the country, which means that actions which he delayed until the last elections, may have carried far more powerful consequence than the new arithmetic of removing people from these United States. He tempers this process with magic that the temporary granting of temporary residency was a general escape from plans not well known which may not rang through. This action is not mistaken as a reaction to hints by Republican Majority leader, who is rumored to be working along with others to have Obama impeached from office.

US of A, is not severely underpopulated but underpopulated and in every conceivable estimate, we need more people in this Country. Anyone who is well traveled through these United States will see elements of severely underpopulated Canada all over it. New York City is Hong Kong and doesn't need to be, but travel to Albany, a whole State Capital of the State of New York, and you will surprised at how desperate the town is by 8 pm. Much of Upstate New York is open wilderness of snowflakes in the winter. There is nothing up there saving for some specific areas where people live and animals of kinds end running at the upcoming vehicles. This is supposed to be State of New York will the glitters of immigrants, let alone neighboring State of Connecticut and New Jersey. However, the majority of immigrants entering the US in the last 20 years and especially the last 10 years are mostly South Americans. They have their contribution in construction jobs which no one can take from them, but let’s face it, this move by President Obama is generally expected to be largely challenged by Americans, including if not especially White-European Americans, who are socially facing new challenges with these people from South America and from Mexico. Some of us wonder if Mexicans for instance can be persuaded to dump Spanish as a language of choice for American English as language of originality, for all that these people did and have done in last in the 6 (Six) centuries was to make their way to Mexico, first as immigrants including Hernandez Cortes, then as militants against Montezuma and the land has since been theirs by speech.

President Obama is left no choice but to endorse of the graft committee recommendations for immigration without compromising his own position, police, military and National position. The crux of the problem is not immigration or prepended loss of jobs, but the attitude of these people in America, especially the future role of language. Is there a future where we have two Americas, one Spanish and the other English? Are we doing away with democracy by accommodating bi-cultural, bi-racial, bi-lingual tendencies instead of multi-lingual, cultural, racial, etc, country since bi-lingual permeation of social America creates a-two America which exponentially endows Spanish speakers and propertied Latino with all the new privileges and job opportunities in names of bi-lingual, but delineates other Americans. This is the main event of American cultural and immigration reforms - not the people or the population size. For all we know, Houston Texas is toast no small pretenses to new emerging two Americas in one Country and it seems to the best of us, that a hint of conquest broods from this civil blind-folding of America. This is the main problem.

According to some Aryan theology, ‘two language is evil’ and if one is wandering how Rome replaced Greece as a power house despite the Samnite 120 year wars which was decided in favor of Romans by Greeks, the Nike that returned to Rome came from Greeks but easily became a Roman signatory a few decades later. What happened what the use of both languages in Rome and in Greece and eventually, Latin was the only language. Language as an intellectual property is resisted as a form of identity which speakers hold with special interest, for instance, migrants living in the United States for the first time, do not consider it wise to lose their native language. What however happens is that a stigma as strong as the peoples of these United States hides under the garb on speech and language with several interpretation resulting from accents and dialects. Miguel Unamuno the respected Spanish orator once asserted that “Language is the blood of the spirit”, given weight of meaning how any immigrant could either consider themselves English speaking Americans, and others Spanish speaking.

It is interesting to relive the fact that either English, Spanish or even French, can be considered native language of the Americans. These three are not, a mistake which divides and conquers people under the bag of the past history, whereas in home town of New York, there are social enclaves that are predominantly Irish and the struggle to keep Gaelic alive, communities that are predominantly Russian and Police with their levels of crimes and (Natashas), for instance Brighton Beach also called ‘Odessa-by-sea’. There are the Little Italy New York, up to Mulberry until dogged in by Chinese right up their alley from Chinatown further than Canal looking at the dearly missed Manhattan Bridge. These icons make their presence in New York as new comers and eventually break even into the State. Little Italy used to be African Town at the turn of the 19th century including downtown up to Washington park and Bleecker, a century earlier. These towns and the colossal presence of Japanese Americans at Main Street Queens New York, Haitians in Carnassial Brooklyn, Jamaicans in Gun hill and White plains road, Mexican in Roosevelt Avenue Queens, Koreans in Sunny Side, Puerto Ricans in the Bronx, Spanish in Harlem, Blacks and African in Harlem, Polish and Russian Jews at Williamsburg, Polish and Cyrillic at Upstate New York of Albany, Irish and Irish Italians in Schenectady, etc, arrived fourth, fifth, and sometimes sixth generations ago, spoke different languages but made it part of their immigration policy to protect the interest of one language. This language is American English.

We as Americans do not leave in isolation of the world, but in so far as top nations of the world are concerned, for instance Russia, we can look a better part of our history by making room for less fortunate immigrants hiding for right and wrong reason from the law. It is law that controls the movement of people, some of whom has their intention were manicured to a point that a nation is forced to weigh the price of individual benefit from the rest of the Country. If personal pursuit of interest surpasses the general interest of a nation, there is a Malthusian concern though badly applied. If measure therefore of many parts of the world such as Russia as the case should indicate, we are ahead of the curve since from the lips of Putin we heard him mention that no foreign enclaves are to be found in Russia including Chinatown characteristic of their partner. Here, we test our flair in being appreciation when for instance in US, there are more Chinatowns than anywhere in the world, and each of these towns are decorative of Chinese language and English mosaic, against the primary interest and wishes of the Country. England on the other hand is not giving immigrant population any breathing space or they permitted to climb certain special economic ladders despite what we can permit ourselves to tolerate. One Country that sees the need to permit a useful dose of others into their realm and expel people with questionable background is the United States and all immigrants and their citizenry should look at from a chance to better the country or import the best possible, to permit its staying power than make it poorer with abandon as we see in California.

Here we remove from logic, the handicap situation of future estimate under the canopy of language with other pretensions showing its mark and verity in is social aspect, an aspect that need to be dead and buried for any lengthy redoubtable threshold of co-existence is possible, stating clearly that America in the view of this author need a population two times its current size, at least half a century from now, that the quota system to electronically and politically yield section of the country after a presumed imaging – our image – is an open sabotage on the larger canvass of the country with all the new and trying premise of United States. Let it manifest from the stables of President Obama and the doctored view and emphasis on Criminal history, is as much a controlling influence on the bias of artificially pruning some new Americans of the struggles and hiding and for their American act and amnesty, whereas if prune juice is better applied in language and diction of separating one group from another, for here, the liquidity of interaction between the component parts is injured by attitude, by apartheid, and by historical acclaim which the new comers having no definitions for their actions, or lack thereof of such action emerge a new nation or formidable nation with trying expositions on language. How pathetic?

 

In a testimony given by Stephen J. Solarz who was for many years a member of New York house of Representative, in his testimony titled ‘Official English; A concession to Nativism’ delivered on May 11TH, 1988, threw additional light on root carnal of some the opposition to immigration – even though in the author view, we may not want it but may need it – is that language may bring people together, it may divide them. According to him, America may not be expected to be another Tower of Babel or another Quebec, to have an understanding on the importance of promoting one language. Arguing from background in New York, he monitored his privileges, saying “I am proud to say that during a walk through my district, one would hear my constituents speaking over a dozen languages, including Yiddish, Russian, Hebrew, Greek, Arabic, Farsi, Polish, Hungarian, German, Spanish, Italian, Haitian Creole, Korean, and Chinese.” Although the large and nearly colossal migration of South Americans (Latino) and Spanish Speakers to New York, has more than dwarfed every other group, to the point that every major instructions are written in both English and Spanish and almost by force, that it now compels others to grudgingly question the concession to Spanish that is proving so fatal an instrument in the death of English or others pursuant of the same language.

 

Since there are more Jewish people in New York than most people, it makes a kinder argument on how the Arabs and Arabic speakers would have looked at the bi-lingua factor of English and Hebrew or Yiddish. The Speaker equally gave an example, that based on the example from the WWII, that the advantages of singularity of language was buttressed in the letters sent to specific key members of the society, many of used English a common banter against the language of their old countries, that “…the office of War Information sent out publications in Seventeen different languages – Baltic, Chinese, Czechoslovakians, Filipino, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarians, Italians, Japanese, Polish, Portuguese, Scandinavian, Spanish, Serbo-Croatian, and Yiddish.” Each of these languages didn’t feel stymie when compared and translated through English and had no specific sense of censorship since others were receiving the same treatment. If Obama’s speech pointed that the United States is the country of immigrants, he relives the idea that Uncle Sam probably needs you and probably has opportunities for you and your gifted ability, that from history these opportunities has been sabotaged by crime magnates and syndicates, and has been poisoned by redoubtable national interest from people lacking faith in the country....

 

 

II

 

 

This inception of Spanish as a tool for accommodating immigrants who are still on their way to America, has become a weapon on mass destruction of American lifestyle and language. It has also created and threatened to create the culture of two Americans which is most evident in border town such as my beautiful and hostile San Antonio.  It is not that the replacement is a far less value or poison to the system as others may sanctioned it, but absence of merits in a society that is not new to apartheid. Such discourses may not be expected in Obama’s speech, it is below his office, but it is a serious and cancer ridden poison that need to be treated with its anti-dote. Such issue is raising some tension that should not be taken for granted, especial in border towns, who are percepts victims of their past, are doing themselves more harm like Muslims and their fellowship of Allah, were scattered as the sheep went their way. 

 

“My fellow Americans, we are and always will be a nation of immigrants.  We were strangers once, too.  And whether our forebears were strangers who crossed the Atlantic, or the Pacific, or the Rio Grande, we are here only because this country welcomed them in, and taught them that to be an American is about something more than what we look like, or what our last names are, or how we worship.  What makes us Americans is our shared commitment to an ideal – that all of us are created equal, and all of us have the chance to make of our lives what we will.” Obama’s speech (fox news transcript)

 

 

Walter Huddleston former Senator of Kentucky speaking to a joint session on the impact of language in American life, mentions that “But for the last fifteen years, we have experienced a growing resistance to the acceptance of our historic language, an antagonistic questioning of the melting pot philosophy that has traditionally helped speed newcomers into the American main stream.” If we may comment on this speech away from Obama’s recent speech, there is no such thing as ‘historic language’ in America, we become as we are part of a growing cultural of deference whose motivation in New American came through the Dutch, the English or Anglo-Saxons, the Scots who came later, the Irish as well, the Germans, Scandinavians, Italians and even the French, all speaking a language closer to English language but hints of separation especially from Latin, that English language was not chosen as a traditional language, it was the only possibly language of the New Americans from former territories called New Amsterdam and so on, who waged some war against Indians in Pennsylvania and to the territory in New York, and accepted English language as the formal expression language including the French, that at the time of their arrival in the South, even Spanish exceptions to the course took on the language. English was considered a formal language of the people and by people ahead of an equally majority French but were done in by the Dutch and Scandinavians in the North. People also spoke a different dialect and with accent in US, it is due to the influence of more than one language which their closest spoke and which added sound to the speakers, sometimes with a second meaning. The senator from Kentucky also hinted that “The unfortunate result is that thousands of immigrants and non-immigrant children are languishing in near-permanent bilingual – bicultural programs, kept in a state of prolonged confusion, suspended between two worlds, and not understanding what is expected of them.” Well Doc, this is not our problems or my problem, employers can hire whoever they so choses but no one should raise our children for you. Above all, it may further remain a problem as someone said, more than half of the newly promoted in office in the election were voted from 2010, many of them Spanish speakers and Latinos.

 

We may not say this is exactly the case in the United States, or would be the case in future, but the fatal grounds lost in the United States and the erosion of its primal traditions in California and in some parts of Texas, is not without the express importation and doubling up of foreign language. If we are concerned about the expansion of South Americans who have replaced African Americans are the second largest population block in less than 20 years, we may help ourselves in narrating that in so far as Asians are concerned, whose population make up a third of total human beings on earth, they are the future demographic of these United States, that say an African Country alone is three times that size of everyone in Caribbean, we are really looking at dangerous precedent, since the total population of the Caribbean-American who are reasonably close to the border do not begin to challenge the wealth of human trespassing with notice with Mexicans and with the rest of the Central Americans.

 

I for one, do think that Mexico has a lot to say about United States, and in my view should be prevented from reaching the States. But when they reach, there is no way of asking them to return. My argument is not new, it has been used by others, my argument is that some countries cannot removed from United States, does not mean that they are continues routing of these United States since even Canadians who share border with United States are not easily allowed to the States. In this case, it looks like traveling from Mexico to United States is a problem developed from their cultural attitudes than anything else. There is an ownership bracket which still means that the wealth of material information of people moving from Canada – many of whom are Mexicans to United States – have reached new levels, but the precedence its now given a new and striking interpretation when English for instance in Houston for in United States no longer serve a regular newspaper saving the Chronicle. This deliberate murder of English language is not obviously the murder of American way of life or challenge or opposition to it, but the replacing psychology of some of the deeply held conceptions about a society, its opulence, its respect of laws which has seen both the blacks and the whites go at each other, it’s no even considered in parts of Texas, these US laws do not apply to these new brand of emigrants.

That’s the problem. Many of these bi-lingual tigers control not only the English speaking aspect and as far rooms are created in Welfare and minority exercise of income distribution is concerned, they are cornered in names and practicality of bi-lingual – if to say, for instance, that these jobs are for Spanish and Latino speaking only and for the rest of you. With more Asian entering the Americans every day, and more population question arise, it is common sense that a good example about the laws of these Country is given a new and interpreted meaning, that majority of the leading population block, are to show example that if there is one America, two America is prolegomena to several Americans, and the house will in future be divided and of course in steed of Abraham Lincoln citing the Bible, that such house or this ‘house will not stand.’ For all magical intent of reasoning which the age of the past empires; how they fared, how they worked and failed, affords the question, whether or not we that have made it to these United States or born here as the case may be, are part of the older entity that brought us for which we must remain loyal, or we are part of the decimal number that the amounts to a new nation – with or without the definitions of the boiling pot.

 

A boiling pot from embers of American history to the stigma of African American lives, is a question of survival tendencies of those enumerated here, for if there is no boiling point as defined in current status quo or if there is such status quo as boiling point, does is change over time by addition of new cultures and people from the rest of the world, or does it have to be replaced in its entirely with new approaches, forms of speaking and exercise of languages which others don’t speak in the official management of the least corners of these United States? I think, a standing boiling is one that accommodates others, one that transforms itself, one that is capable to retaining its essence or whatever presumed essence the new reality of other arrivals means, but in here, far from other unreal circumstances that has bedeviled American Cities and lives, some basic tenet should not be replaced or status quo open to challenges. That one, the use or abuse of US constitution is not for a specific people however intolerable some of the assumptions are and the extent of its application which gives in and out at Court and in the Street as usually mated out by those holding the power and the weapon, that these are humans are acceptable, that these people make mistakes are acceptable, that the norms and baring limits of the application of process is the determinative of all nomenclature associated with it. The varying interpretations of the laws and constitution is not removed from the comparing that is keeping to a bi-lingual recourse, however unpromising some of the delivered responses are, it looks from all intent, that the funk with laws and the Americans constitutions begins and ends with attritions based on race, color, gender, religion, and very not dangerous of them all, language.

 

 If we all in future agree to speak Spanish or Latin given a swell of demand for it, it can said, that the constitution need to be interpreted in such language, if it should then the anthem must also be broken and translated and spoken in Spanish. Not in future of the nation which is a current condition definition looking forward, but in the meaning of the few institution that protect that the very inch of the country which is defined not by its past, but in the current discourses prevailing by the day. Such as a country may not take into account the new realities arrived from elsewhere by others, but needs them to see that moving to United States is an attempt to elevate some of the best reserves of the old country, that there is nothing wrong in using the language of the old country – that in fact American welcomes it, the majority of the confusion and the trouble with new people adjusting in America is how easily they rubbish the status quo by entertaining the features from past lives or denying, and replacing in the new lands of the Americans with old systems no longer as ease even in the old Country.

I take it that the discontinues availing of the circumstances surrounding the formative States such as California and Texas, New Mexico and Arizona, the wars with Spanish Army based in Mexico and employer of Mexicans situated in what was a disputed territory of Alamo, does not begin to levitate that Texas or California and the four mentioned states were all Mexican States. There is no denying that parts of Texas seem in many ways than one a part claimed by Hidalgo (Guadalupe) as a turf, but did not historically mean that it was in meanest of historical imagination Spanish or Mexican, it was not, hence the real reasons for the war. What became United States added these territory because it was illegally occupied, initially by a combination of run-away slaves and natives, and other who sought the land armistice. There is no denying that some of the assumption about these territories and why from experience many immigrants cast a long view on the South is from this misdiagnosed view of the past history of the United States. Such view may now and in time to come be considered anti-American and nearly saboteur by the standards of Word Wars, given that the black themselves and their Marranos, including people of manifest destiny, Apache left overs, Jewish families from Spain and Netherlands some of the names of these families are still the record of Texas States and other migrant Mexican with long chain families in Texas and across, no longer apply and no longer have a personalized states in these founded areas but lived it till the continental army, still has no say since the intifada at the formative early and late Klansmen ages in Texas and parts of California essentially abated with gold rushers. We therefore suggest that the history of these areas which has seen the largest population explosion may and may have added to the growing insistence of the use of Spanish language, which for deliberate opportunity of power insist and use the language, are part of the social restlessness with some of the immigrants who are actually hardworking.

The old maps assumed to have represented a portion of the Country once owned by Mexico for a start and who in the company of others following their lead dream with a vanishing grasp of remaking the State with levels of actuary that has kept others in denial, may be demised since even the very names of the States is truly Spanish closer to Teixeira than Tehocas but ultimately a separate identity, mitigate on some historical claims even to the rest of the country.  The old maps may or may not contained lines of the past, but the area for Texas subtends on the tip of Alamo and parts of San Antonio, no to the lands eventually associated with Stephen F. Austin where black soldiers initially made their home and who helped to purchase from the Spanish a healthy portion of San Antonio and the Alamo was a second matter. For all intents of academic exercises, these assumptions have new meanings, ay have led to the dangerous levels of bi-lingual application of process or method of excision, which in California has forwarded a new but diminished State regarded by many as a third world. It looks like the embarkation of some of the bi-lingual using and its soft embouchure for others without Spanish background dogs on both parties with marginal view that a society and its championing of the forward resources in the global are seriously challenged and severely handicapped as if a part of the Country is be default foreign nation, a two-kind of nation whose evidence is the disappearing of the old with something less appealingly.

If Obama is looking to placate the rest of the nation on the merit of his exercises given the predated moves in parts of Louisiana and Florida, in New Mexico and Arizona, of removing any body of suspicions physicality and accent, and profiling such persons with direct intent at exporting, he should focus on ending the public use of English and Spanish in any form and any means, either for public consumption or for free planning of the public works, for as long this invested language barrier which is sensitive to barriers in constitution is stayed and not labeled Civil violation of others, then Obama’s Amnesty is not on the same categories as others in major empires before him.  

 

 

 

A Fergoson Verdict

By

Sampson Iroabuchi Onwuka

Perhaps the topic should write A Death in Ferguson which like the verdict occur every day, but something strange and sinister is out of joint and authors reflect on the verdict. If we conjure the images of Alistair Cook and his 'letters from America', perhaps A Death in Ferguson meets the second meaning, a valid opinion unrestrained by reasons and therefore wholesale argument. But this is not the case....Although the economic cost of human life is the theme of the second era of civil right laws and human rights, it is deficient in the terms of a James Coleman, or a Gary Becker in analyzing its toll on the families. Perhaps a Roase, perhaps a Hechman, et al Vilner, in normative importance of preventive force which is important, perhaps a Posner in second meaning and second era of law, the economic significance of human factor may even supersede the moral factor altogether lower and generally inexplicable. Its consideration in Ferguson Verdict may be an over-stated beginning, perhaps of a third era in 5th Amendment and Civil law, the pure theory of economic consequence in the scalar pyramid of moral reasons which differ from a case by case basis of similar Ferguson Verdict - hence a ‘rule of reason’  - to economic and monetary factor.

I

The shooting of Michael Brown by Officer Darren Wilson divided Ferguson in Missouri over the alleged behavior of the officer and officers towards African Americans and Hispanic communities. The verdict reached by the inquest and grand jury on November 24th 2014 to clear officer of any wrong doing is not so much a surprise for many people as it is what some people consider an addition to the plea for Amendment regarding police immunity and the invocation of the 5^th Amendment, which in terms like this may revert to inception of immunity from prosecution. Since there are testimonies given by either side and especially the respondent and defendant Darren Wilson, it meets that care may have been taken in narrowing down the material cases of perjury so persistent in wrong cases of police activity or assault, since from all intent of the Adversarial 5th Amendment, the police in this case would be satisfied to have presented the evidences to both parties before making it to court, all of which should would be introduced in the Court without additional material, it may be that the police had demonstrable privileges of presenting the verbal and written testimonies and evidences that the adversary party or to the people of the State should be part of a hearing migrate to that level via public hearing and prosecution in limie of defense manufacturing evidence versus the prosecutors, pursuant of the Brady versus Maryland.

 

Jim Salter and David A. Lieb, Associated Press (25th of Nov.26, 2014) filing on Ferguson, described that “Attorney Benjamin Crump said at a news conference Tuesday that he and the rest of the Brown family's legal team objected to St. Louis County Prosecutor Bob McCulloch's decision to call a grand jury and to not appoint a special prosecutor.” That according to Benjamin Crump "We could see what the outcome was going to be, and that is what occurred last night," Crump said. That ‘McCulloch said the jury of nine whites and three blacks met on 25 separate days over three months, hearing more than 70 hours of testimony from about 60 witnesses, including three medical examiners and experts on blood, toxicology and firearms.’ Since the proceeds from the Court suggest that the officer testified during the hearing demonstrated what happened and why, the circumstances resulting in the dismissal of the charges may be said to have travelled the route of prescribed circumstances surrounding the ‘scope of the officer’s duty’. According to Salter and Lieb, ‘Wilson's lawyers issued a statement praising the decision and saying the officer, who has remained out of the public eye since the shooting, is grateful to his supporters.’ That the "Law enforcement personnel must frequently make split-second and difficult decisions," the lawyers wrote. "Officer Wilson followed his training and followed the law." Well said in kindly light of the premise of a case that ended in their favor.

 

Notionally speaking, the ‘scope of officer’s duty’ is comprised of the purpose of their assignment on that day, (1) use of verbal communications which is primary recourse to other stepwise applications of process for instance the vocal commands of ‘freeze’ ‘hold your hands up’, (2) the use of hand gestures which the police usually demonstrates including asking the suspect to remove his or her hands from the pockets, or raise it up when it can be seen, and most of the time, suspects usually comply. Most trying moments occur at this point and when either the police or the city takes action, their action is marginal in their conception of the circumstance and the outcomes very serious. Most people stand to be hurt in the course of this process and most police gradually their hand in the process and application of force becomes a constant. The next level (3) is matter of sequences, whether or not the police office met all these range of activity leading to final commands and use of force – usually a chemical; repellent gun, tear gas, and/or a Mace depending on the age and veracity of the object, especially his or her vulnerability in square circumstances of mass demonstration. If all of these steps are met towards pulling of a gun then there are problems between the officer and the victim all these cannot be exhausted that easily during a process involving any trained officer and may require a specialty prosecutor to remove the intension of the police from the decision to actually go beyond extreme force to deadly and termination force.  

 

Other factors play forward on the nature of the incident and to some degree the persons on interest who tune their attention to new facilities of the murder of a 12 year old in Cleveland who held his hands up as the autopsy shows. There is power and absolute power in robbing people of their right especially under these circumstances and this power if exercised with Machiavelli is not without the intent at achieving extra inches of manhood. It is a matter of reason and people shouldn’t try to understand.   

 

A Michael Brown case of such meaning or suspicion of burglary to accede the fecundity of the police, the grand jury is left with a different bargain, which is mainly delivered by the Brady Materials, tied perhaps to the office and so be it, that the meaning of the Brady vs Maryland eliminates the diabolic interference from the social media and the public, that in structure of errors which by the nature of our society is erroneous in construction, that the ex-cathedra of specie literature merits a second page in the construction of persecution since the error which is definitive of faults is demonstrative therefore equal an outcome perhaps at the court. The destructive errors in this case is between two polar ends of the interpretation of the law, one may reprehend the victim on his actions following a lengthy discovery process, and the other which is the ex-cathedra or the bull of Scopus is depended on whether Darren Wilson was to face trials in the first place and who proclaims the law for the Court. The process of determinative error which are erroneous in its application may proceed from first hand testimonies to the general aim of the process which is the purpose of the police action and presence, that explicating these processes may be expected to reveal elements of construction hence in deciding culpability of officer Darren Wilson ‘who pulled the trigger’ the original intent of the police is a premised dissent.

 

But a terminus after 70 hours and 25 days of hearing, nine jury members including 6 whites and 3 blacks, including medical consideration abrogate such an Amicus from even the highest office, perhaps why Washington did not bother to intervene until full exercises of due process, and in some circumstances, perhaps the cursory dismissal will be based on the history of Ferguson Police, where the cases carry equal weight on how Ferguson Police normally deals with minorities and in this case African Americans. We can argue that this instance refers to the records of Michael Brown is a controlling influence in the outcome of the hearing and should be fully investigated. This record can be placed in the discovery precinct as those of Darren Wilson and Missouri police. Have these Police acted in recent past with caution in such a time as these, or is Missouri littered with bipolar actions explicated in the main by the final actions of the police office? What execution of process would make a teenager call a police a ‘pussy’ under the merest of circumstances, and do these officers suffer the lack of public thrust which the States with Police brutality has shown in the past?

 

Michael Brown’s murder in Ferguson and the verdict, It is no longer a simple case of customary dismissal of an officer under scrutiny than the example set in motion by the verdicts which from Police Shooting incidents in recent times and the use of 5th Amendment suggest a new interpretation of the process. In Cleveland protesters held out her posters surmounting these names; Tamir Rice (the 12 year old), Tanisha Anderson, Melisk Williams, Timothy Russell, Kendrick Brown, Daniel Fickler, Michael Brown*, Eric Garner, Akai Gurley, Rekia Boyd, allegedly killed by Police is fencing for a new look at arraignment of those who carry out the law with guns in their waist, at least the comparison that Police officers murdered by Civilians are not nearly the same, does not in the light of recent incident and riots also mean that Civilians are not capable of fighting back. But these enumerated dead may or may not be tainted with blood themselves or with crimes of precedence. It may also seem that some of the deaths were perhaps the victims fault; some perhaps reacted to the officer and were caught in line of fire. But these are obvious incarnations of police protection and creed.

 

With the advent of Boko Haram in Nigeria and the strategic assault on Police and military, the comparison to the conditions in the states is not exactly different, for if as they say that men such Huey Newton, Michael Stokes, Sealy B, faced off with the police, their public enemy status would have ended their existence on the first day were it not a decline in public trust resulting from the abuse of police force. Times have really changed and these Police officers are better educated to handle any cases, for instance, the case of mainly White Police officers of Missouri and Ferguson is not material to Baltimore Police department that is both black and white, some of which still engage in some crimes and another.

 

Here, if the autopsy is pointing out that this victim, Michael Brown, was probably raising his hands at the time of the shooting, the encore will fall differently on how a Police Officer would be so incised by the behavior of the person involved to return a gun shoot for what he described a punch. That punch or a blow did not travel from the round one of the actions of verbal instructions to detriment force if it was driven by something else.  The hammer of Jurisprudence will prevail for a level 2 of a pre-trail and perhaps more than Day 2, but if there was no contemnor’s argument citing the probity of evidence and rule of evidence in the execution of process, then the prosecution would have failed on day 1 and the rest a question of persuasion and performance. The Performance rated prosecution may be pushing it too far, for by law, the Prosecution under the canopy of the people should be exercised with necessary pretext of law, persecution reaching more than permissible is explicit of personal interest. In this case, there is a possibility that a case should yield amenity to impersonal evaluation of the incident urging an indictment based on precedent. As a matter, some of the assumptions in the case do not merit a long consideration; either does not transfer the indictments or charges from Personal trespassing of the law to municipality.

 

Of course the municipalities that hired Ferguson as officer offered him redemption clause within the law, torching the Federal guarantee of equal treatment before the law which includes his, and the estimable inquiries into the cause of the actions which usually resolve around a commission.

 

It will not be a first, second, third, and fourth time that such commissions are formed, for instance, the Rodney King Incident in Los Angeles threw the light into the badly managed cults of execution in the Los Angeles Police. The rise of protest minsters of civil rights such as Rev Sharpton and the involvement of Johnnie Cochran helped to redeem some of the losses for their families, but the crime is committed already and the investigation into the LAPD was secondary to the appointed agents of change such as Chief Daryl Gates appointed by Michael Bostic who was the then Mayor of Los Angeles, who some argue was not exactly a saint. But the long arms of justice do not always fall elegantly on the course of rights in pursuant of justice, but in the years that led to rise of Black Liberation Army and the Panthers, and the death of two officers of the law who were also marine expeditionary; Gregory Foster and Laurie Rocco, explains the sensitive package in administration of law and enforcement of City ordinances which require local knowledge and the temperance of integrity.

 

Integration which Rudy Giuliani claimed to have initiated in New York will become a different matter. These commission usually make their case clear but the legislative intent like this very one affecting a young Michael Brown and officer Darren Wilson, is not different from Rodney King in California, or differently from Amaduo Diallo or many African Americans who were gunned down by Police officers with as many 51 bullets of continues shooting in one instant all under Rudy Giuliani. All these gradually came to an end with the appointment of Michael Bloomberg and Police Commissioner Ray Keller with reserved credit to Giuliani making the argument that Mayors and municipal authorities play a serious hand in the evolution of a city’s disquiet, harangue and perhaps excessive application of law in a City and in the Country.

 

Am opposed to Giuliani 100% in terms of his recent interview regarding the incidents in Ferguson, since his administration characterized by White Cops and the death of African Americans in any circumstance can viewed without precedence given the history of Cops in America and in New York. These arguments shift the Vermeer Caliper in official police actions and duties to the criminality of a precinct, from individual such as Darren Wilson to the envelop theory of general and social republic of this group versus that group and the historical reenactment.

 

Am opposed to Giuliani statement and interview since a statement given the crying and weeping during 9/11 which I for one saw with a live witness, majority of the noise makers and those who flaunted the over-turned verdicts on many shooting incidents in New York, did not change their opinion and their support for Rudy Giuliani but forced to confront terror on a different sort during 9/11, with many of them visible disoriented with many of these whites actually tearing their hairs out and it was difficult to see some of them shed tears which you wouldn’t believe was there.  It was easy panic which some hard living from the past made possible and why Blacks dealing with Black or others in violent situations, especially with Whites (most young) in Uniform, should use instincts for corporation. The Mayor of New York came late during the melee of crashing cement during 9/11 and it was impossible to him to have managed to hold his tears based on what he saw.

 

The History of Cops or the origins of the words Cop in New York and used elsewhere started with similar conflict between the Irish and Scottish immigrants who lived mostly in five point districts and others from Britain and from New York over who owns who, what and why (Gangs of New York)? But the real story behind these conflicts was a problem of migration to areas already struggling.  New York Police refused assimilation of these Italian, Irish and Scottish new comers who called half breed Europe or White Niggers. They were constantly harassed by Police, shot when they it called for it, and were generally the object of militant police work with underlying influences. Whereas African-Americans were given arms-length treatment in New York affairs and elsewhere, they wielded more power than now, and historically they demanded the integration of the New York police. When the municipality refused they sided these Irish and Scottish and immigrant others from Russian and Poland who are perhaps ancestors of Darren Wilson and began to harbor police ‘most wanted’ whose crimes included attack on the police with police copper as souvenir to show for it. Sometime the police was arrested and disgraced by having all his cloths removed and a big helmet placed on his head and asked to run. It reached a point that the police chief decided to enlist these ethnic whites as they were first called to in dealing with their own kinds. They were also given a small compulsory quotient of Sanitation department which the paraded made popular.

 

It didn’t take long before this new grade of Americans became dominant in the force and since then managed New York City Police. According to legends, one of the demands made on these new recruits was orchestrating a subduction of blacks or niggers as they were called who the police were having direct problems with. It was however a means and a way of gaining Irish and Scottish loyalty and others and after a few decades in police force and under the collar of the State, they forgot these daggers that ended their terror and disgrace. These half- bred opinions in gumption of Giuliani statement of integration merits an envelope inquiry, are actually less probing in their dealing with Blacks, and when poorly educated in public opulence can take actions based on these preconceived notions about their expectations in the Police. It was Bloomberg who ended all that nonsense Police assault, murder and persecution, including the reign of organized crime that controlled a sizeable percentage of New York City and although he hurt the City's pocket, these incidents in Ferguson happen when the Mobs have a stake in any police. It will be wise to put the legal process under suspicion and oppressive for right reasons to compare and contrast the difficult roles played by Irish Pubs (republic) and Scotland Yard in New York or elsewhere.  Even when Italians in New York were labelled criminals by nature, it was these Black and African Americans that opposed that view.

 

Using an analogy to the Ferguson verdict and based on the account of Herbert Beigel and Allan Beigel (1977) of Chicago corruption investigation, the State effectively combated organized crime through initiation of several processes, which required that a respondent officer was ‘not granted immunity’ ‘nor required dismissal of the indictment against him.’, the process was not to be yes and no and admissibility of clearance but on standing testimonial over a period of probationary hearing. The persecutor was armed with a different tool since the officer was let not ‘off hook’ on hand, a case on such significance. According to Beigel and Beigel “When an officer goes into court the slightest twist of his testimony can make or break a case. How he reacts to a frightened suspect fleeing from the scene of crime can mean the difference between that person’s life or death. How he handles those situations which he confronts daily, but which never result in formal action, will dictate how he views the public and how the public sees him.” “That the idea of exercising unfettered discretion and power, he often does as he sees fit and feels little need to ponder the consequences of what he has done. The temptation to be corrupted by one’s own feeling of power is hardly an unexpected consequence.”    

 

Having indicated this process as more ridden to fault, opulence in general condition from the police and the blacks themselves is the highest decorum as they say spirit of decorum. For all the changes that has taken place in New York police, neighborhood gangs and neighborhood committee migrate into the Police force and force when not checkered may be used by either side of the racial divide – in or out of police office – with the public pointing to superficial points such as minority, racial inclination or declination, class, etc.,. Obvious vices of such cases is based on deeply rooted conception of whose the other group is, for instance, anyone familiar ganja moves, needs not to wait for the suspect to move a second fiddle for him or her to take actions, or anyone soliciting for drugs try new invention on an already known street codes for illegal drugs, and some of the ‘drugs companies’ are refereed by the Police and when there are trespasses they act in the names of law enforcement.

 

Put it kindly, too much time in the field usually avail on the police officer with all form decibel infidelity with law and here as they are sometimes wrong, there are degrees of opinion and puncturing of humus conscience which a granulation of these experiences usually discover a police officer prejudicial and sometimes acutely prejudicial to several and artificial moves on the street. To the bystander and to the general public, these deaths may be circumstantial, may be viewed from left and right of personal persuasion, may land to speculation that the police under these circumstances should acted differently, but the difference is that most police officers spent majority of the time observing, can put an end to any drug diseased environment and those who know it may persuade to score with their creativity on the larger canvass that may or may have be innocent.      

 

Michael Brown was not murdered in the City of New York, though the sympathies are felt very severely or Darren Wilson said to have been born or raised in New York. Therefore, this must be acting out the fantasies of some sort manicured and restrained under the garb of arms or color of state, that the denial of any wrongs was well practiced will point to the possibility that they were ingredient in the exercise of law. The Mollen Commission studied police corruption in New York and showed similar cases where the Police testified that from their training, they were asked to generally break assailant if necessary in the process of setting example. That there are different ways of dealing with different races, for instance the Black has a record of being spontaneous and may be the first of the general public to pull a gun – assuming they have one.

 

As such a quick reaction from the Police was a gap between life and death. Of course the generality of the Mollen Commission premised the Giuliani as mayor, and many of the commentaries did not agree with the commission and others mentioned that if it was a matter between their son’s life and the suspect, he is should protect him or herself, which usually means, execute if necessary. But many of the cases involving the dastardly beating of Amaduo Diallo and many other African Americans who were shot by mainly officers recruited into New York from a different state, argued by Muslims to have a been a strategy of ensuring such divisive approach leading to instances like Michael Brown.

 

Most police officers from Brooklyn and those who grow up in their section Brooklyn and were asked to work in these district, are less likely to commit such crimes in their own districts but from Police Academy you are likely to learn that this process is not exactly appreciated since it encourages the solemnity of Street and Police work in familiar environment.

 

Naturally, the Michael Brown’s case creates an international sensation and from the incidents and reactions from Republicans regarding Obama’s Amnesty in recent times, the paucity of facts and information regarding the plans of the Republicans may receive additional light given the silence of the majority leader and several key Republican leaders at this point. They don’t need to say anything either. However, the riot which has seen some damages take place and the looting and arrests Missouri and Cleveland were not unexpected. Look at it from a standpoint of a man or woman who is looking to be arrested and who is determined to die than in silence than share any testimony about his actions in a police led investigation.

 

Such a person may be willing to endure all kinds of persecution and suffering but in the end, the ‘deed is done’ and the ‘consequences’ as they say is ‘damned’ from the beginning. It is no concern that such actions take place, or there any such police agenda to deal and torture blacks or minorities, the outcome may have due to new realities of population growth and control, of African Americans and Hispanics who may or may not have acted in manners evocative of civil disturbances or as Giuliani once said, several cases of outright murder – up to 93% of the black who are murdered are murdered by other blacks.

 

For officers who see this every day, it leaders the possibility that may have developed a sense of agitation towards a certain group, which may be outside their training, for all officers since St. Clair Commission, the Metcalfe Commission in Chicago and in the investigations made by Beige brothers in 1997 concerning the actions of the State of Illinois and the City of Chicago in dealing with corruption allegation of the 18th District in Austin District, that once the State took an active interest through its Strike Force in dealing murderous aliases in the Chicago Police it was a question that the Webs gradually grew thing on what wrong. One of those involved in Metcalfe Commission was a man by name John Burris. According to his one of his books, he mentioned several cases of Police Commission such as the Philadelphia and also that of St. Clair where similar initiative was made on behalf of the general public following problems of police mortality.

 

As we can see from the list, they do not contain Ferguson or any other Cities such as Florida in the case of George Zimmerman. It shows that the new found rife was perhaps not always the case, meaning that this actions were in fact recent and the development very recent. The near guarantee of protection by those in the corridor of Justice is both good and bad, especially in extreme cases of this nature, may be considered bad and detrimental, for sure, no law exist that easily convicts anyone in color of state and most Americans will not be happy to even see a least active police or military jailed, saving for extreme cases as this. What was this Michael Brown crime? There is no reason that can expire on the morality of a gunshot.  But this is a judgment call and valid judgment not necessary in this case.

 

Put it clearly, there are reasons why any African American will pick up a gun in name of Police officer and following a squeamish physicality with an unarmed European American youngster and ends up shooting him or her. The street will bleed red with angst and believe or not, similar such incident by an African American under the color of state or whatever color they choose ends shooting another European American teenager of about 12 years old, the country will descend on these Police officers, at least, will no longer see these people are Police officers rather as Criminals breaking public confidence and hiding under the shadow of the office.   

 

In 1998, there was an Amnesty International who performed an Amicus on the what Police actions on the large swaps of its 14 major Cities; Atlanta, Detroit, New York, Chicago, Minnesota, Boston, Los Angeles, New Orleans, Philadelphia, Portland, Providence, San Francisco, and Washington D.C, where reports showed that “Police officers engaged in unjustified shootings, severe beatings, fatal chokings, and unnecessarily rough physical treatment in Cities across the United States.” That “their police superiors, city officials, and the justice department fail to act decisively to restrain or penalize such acts or even record the magnitude of the problems.” They further suggested that majority of Police arrest and brutality were consigned to one group of Americans, further probing that Police in some of these circumstances actually initiated the situations and they discovered to the alarming of the public that Police were let go from so many assault cases as if there was a culture and habit which essentially grew out of it.

 

Michael Brown and Tamir Rice incident is reflective of a new ideologies which some may have sensed in today’s America, that it is not impossible to get away with murder which has been the case in our country, but the law specifies the circumstances in which any can make such argument, in one case, in a self-defense argument. With the idea that a 5th Amendment for those in office gives us additional protection and immunity from prosecution set the banter between the people who are perceived as the enemy and need to be disciplined (and yes many of them do) and the rest of us who see existence with comparative limelight of the other world who in Ralph Ellison’s words are the ‘invisible’ other. Many whites cannot pretend that they are not happy with the outcomes in Missouri; it is a show of power that is sourly needed given new challenges from Asia. Herewith and from experience we are articles of history that historical inquiry is not a law but of a fact that people’s minds tend to change when there is a presence of guns. Mo Zedong adage that ‘with the barrel comes power’ is fitting for those in power, enforcers of the law with ‘license to kill’.

 

Put it clearly, we cannot continue the culture of humiliation through the use of force and have a bunch of sexually deviant Courtesans tell us stories about clear and convincing cases of unusual use of force. In very lettered sense of the very purpose of the Police which is to protect and serve, it comes with some guarantee of power and exercise of discretion and judgment, and for that reasons, taxpayers are participants in the long and tedious contractual agreement between the Police department and the States or Municipality. Gone are not exactly those days when some puts you down and gets a high water mark on who is charge here. Some of these things are still evident today, and in many ways than, we can even say that at no point in the last thirty sometime years of America has African Americans groped under the forays of other people’s authority.

 

Believe it or drop it, the conditions of US Blacks in 2014 – especially African American male – is worse than it ever was. At no point in the history of the United States are blacks that subtle and persuaded to follow the law than today. At no point in the history of United States have African American been a social lite for many colored types including whites than now, to the point that many new welcome marriages between the Americans include Whites and others in the African American families, vice versa. It is all good to equally argue that in the United States recent interest in African American studies has waned and their identity forged into different streams of academic thoughts. It means that no probably reasons exist for actions of any type to militate against Blacks in any part of the Country.

 

If not for the sacrifice that their compromising with others has caused them; loss of business to minorities who do not recognize their mutual past or future, loss of political power in areas that are traditionally blacks and Indians which now speak a version of second language, especially at the lower houses where the penetration is taking place, drugs have smashed every black neighborhoods in US and some of them with hints of other languages do not identify with others. It looks therefore that the many few deaths that now occur in the age of internet, occupy because these Blacks are not dangerous or hateful, or slothful of authority or as the case would be hard as before, that these gentrification of the post-black or what they call RIP Black may now easily yield a case of Michael Brown, Tamir Rice, etc.

 

There is something peculiarly wrong with these behavioral tendencies which only half the traveled experience of this author will assure you on how African Americans are viewed from all over the world. These incidents involving free will ending of live and do nothing judicial process reflects so well on America that opinions are already entrenched before even the loathed immigrants from Europe, South America, Asia (probably the worst saving Hong Kong and Indonesia), and to some degree Africa make it here. That their actions towards Black and the perceived trespassing of their rights and hence reactionaries to these others is riddled with decision that has little or nothing to offer the situation. These entrenched views pay out differently when they arrive here at a younger age and perhaps have a similar education and perhaps work in some area where they chase their responses together or apart.

 

For instance, Nigerian doctors and Indian Medical Doctors work in State and National hospitals do not readily get along but appreciate the dedication. In it is from here that understanding and accepting them becomes possible. I don’t think that cases would easily arise when either of these people will pick up a gun in a hospital looking for strong characters and shoot the other, even if there are cases of conflicts and fight. Put it this way, the reasons why a Police officer will readily pull his or her gun is that he sees the object in front of him or her or the human in front of the police officer as an outsider, this, includes African Americans in the Police department or women dealing with other women. We point out therefore that facility training of officers or Facility Training Officers associated with new and recruits  should receive additional emphasis, that the idea of law and order does not mean you have do some body someday, that better police officers are those who wouldn’t  need to fire a single shoot throughout their careers.

 

There are many such cases. In other instance, long before physical contacts are made between Police and victims or suspect usually a process of CPR (Courtesy, Professionalism, Respect) is  exhausted clearing the way for control of public or CAO (Chief Aim of the Office/r) through demonstrable show of force only when respect is in doubt. The Police has ‘license to kill’ full stop, that is, no other group can domestically engage or evolve from such circumstances than the local police. Does not mean that its Chief Aim is it to kill, it is only a sickness which the tender and prickly early years in service usually inspire. For instance, a Child could as someone argued become and remain obedient to the authorities until he or she has a chance to exert his or her militancy. He or she is often obedient by default. When anyone has a gun or messes with his or her gun, it lauds the temptation to shoot the gun and ameliorates the tendency to fire it and see how people really die.

 

Best example is F.B.I files that show privates taking pleasure in shooting a horse and watching it die. It’s everywhere and partly a despairingly human side. Most older Police officers very rarely kill in line of duty, most African Americans on the hand hardly pull their guns while sampling opinion or interrogating a seesaw through a neighborhood. But drugs are different stories and in such cases, there are hardly any instances of investigation when there is location. In simple terms, the more exposed anyone in force is to the problems of the society, the greater he or she emphasis safety and precaution, the greater their chances of escaping the murder situation. In comradely of a point raised by Rudy Giuliani on integration of the force, this is perhaps a process, perhaps a beginning process which does not begin and end with racial separation or fantasies of making headlines over a murder perpetrated by obscure and delinquent officers.    

 

For all we know about say a City of New York itself still weaning from police officer such as Michael Palermo who served both organized Crimes and the City, made over 2, 000 arrest but was linked to many informed murders in the City in spite of his work, do not shy from Kenneth Wilson of New Jersey whose testimony of what was happening in New jersey - and may still be happening - armed the City with enough tools to investigate and determine the reasons for unusual actions by Police. The FTO as they call it, of Facility Training operation (process) has been the subject of intense drudging between ministers of later saints such as Rev Al Sharpton, the inquest manufactured by Rudy Giuliani who was mayor of New York in much of the 90’s, and the Civil Complain Review which were inveighed by the he State and the by the Federal government when investigations died a sudden death when Police assault is mentioned. Sometime, these organizations have no money to conduct private investigations, sometimes, they are held against their private wishes and independent fronting by Police Unions who are usually very powerful in Court and legal negotiation. The failure factor in this case involving a so-called unarmed (they usually are) teenager, is whether or not the Court considered the testimony by the Police and from the Police sufficient enough to do away with the death.

Solutions and recommendations

Ferguson and Missouri shouldn’t expect Obama or Federal troops to do what they shouldn't do. Personally African-Americans should do better by helping their society and their community understands positive value which is the only way you can overcome things like this. The history of US is replete of these things mainly on how people understand each other, even Louis Gates Jr., can testify to it, that sometimes people just don't just get it. There is no point in narrating that this sort of thing kept happening in the City of New York until 9/11 when I for one saw people (White people) cry 'they gonna kill us’ ‘they gonna kill us’ and was close in telling these people to shut the hell up as if a police on ground zero, and with Michael Bloomberg came the changes which came with the injury these people directly suffered.

 

This is not a race thing; it is just a question of perception especially when it involves in-betweens. We have to say these things in reaction to what Winston Churchill saw in Germany following his visit and warned the world of what was happening, that the case may relate to Ferguson but what some of us have seen in some American Cities meets with urgency of how Americans perceive of each other.

 

(1)    What these Black people should do is work together and builds their own businesses up. The burning of small business administration is not necessary in terms like this and the use of violence is not very important. Based of civil strife and struggle in several parts of world and Africa, a murder of this type requires direct resolution and change. A change at the police department in Missouri and Wisconsin of a sizeable percentage up to 30% integration of Police and State troopers with minorities especially African Americans. If 25% percent of the Ferguson force is made of Blacks and African Americans, they will meet some of the necessary demands of the shouting crowd.

(2)    The State of Missouri and the City of Ferguson should sample opinion – my favorite -  of the demonstration, especially in key areas of the society and list what needs to be done and what can be done. These sampling of opinion made include sensitive areas of the State public health and resources, usually one of the best sources of the  

(3)    The recommendations made by BeigeI brothers concerning the procedure for investigating police criminality should not be based on subpoena to the police and his affidavit only which can negate the 5th Amendment and grant the officer immunity of persecution. The question prosecutors may be interested in is at what point does an officer ceases to be a property of the State and the municipality and become by matter of law, a private culpable of the just ramifications of the law and its process.

(4)    They also recommended what commissions have maintained that police should not be let off “the hook” just after the hearing that they should go through a reasonable process of probationary hearing where question are asked and reviewed over a reasonable period of time.

(5)    *It is a formal recommendation that a documentary showing Africa-American history in Ferguson or Missouri, new lines of Television Channels for these old and young blacks in American Cities and suburbs following after the examples of Henry Louis Gates Jr., who is too conservative but may be appropriate model for African American audience, that there is no fight against anybody, race or culture, law needs be respected, both in color of the State or out in the street, yet there is a lesson to be earned.

(6)    Whereas the Police Department including Ferguson performs all kinds of functions and training for its employees, the training should involve routine public networking, routine police lecture around Missouri with emphasis on what to do when a Police arrives at the scene. There is reason why Houston Police may have their sour side, but mostly handle any situation without bloodletting. Austin Police routinely conduct lecture and a get to know your Police sessions with the Public, what to do in violent conditions and how to respect and response to the police. These are mainly conducted in sharp and large frame hotels in Austin, but Police Department in extreme cases could do better with routine lectures in Welfare neighborhood, affluence and downtrodden neighborhood and get together in strongly ghetto and black neighborhoods.

(7)    State and City officials, especially elected official can penetrate the work source of most areas, including the advising on the power of guns, power of attorneys, and the police Chief Aim in a society and their ‘license to kill’ if necessary.

(8)    Before constituting a Ferguson Commission and State Inquiry into such incident independent of what happened at the Court and what was decided, the outcomes of the Commission, recommendation of the Commission should include the possibility of a discharge from office of the Police Chief or additional promotion if shooting was at least justifiable. They should also specify the role of the Police and limits of police use of force.

(9)    Civil Complain Board should follow connect the fourth element of the State, the Media. Let the public know what the public complains are, what can be done about it and why.

(10)  Police Unions are not out of control, are they?     

Some of these actions with those in office or administrative ruling are expressions of frustration, which are not easily visible but it’s ridden to others. It is not possible recognize the existence of others unless you are well of your past and their past and the future. In some common history, there is what we may talk as pusillanimity, but largely from a proposing view that alternate views can be viewed alternately. We need more focus on African American education and history, more television authority – if Obama will support it – for proper education of our people. Oprah in my view doesn’t cut it, but she is a good example. Most blacks do not even have respect for themselves let alone other people, and there is a tendency to suggest that post-black is anti-black. I can assure you; this is not what is seeing, including the recent outrages and rape charges on Bill Cosby. If he is not careful in spite of his saintly and over-tried personality and hard endurance which is not perfect, he will find himself in jail. Ray Rice is not of the hook yet, and these other little incident involving someone who’s girlfriend a gun at and police ended up jailing him is a matter of perception and we can help the police by showing the way.   

Lack of financial institution is the ‘root of all evils’ in Black Communities. Black Caucus should understand that Obama and the Country needs encouragement in looking into these things.