President Obama on November 20th, granted amnesty to several
Americas living in the United States with merits of clean records and tax
history, including a grant of temporary classing of these Immigrants whose joys
are not well known, may be considered a high point but not a plateau in the
classic drama on immigration. This is one his executive orders that will
accompany his last days as President from understanding that the Republicans
are ruling party at the Whitehouse. Such actions by the President are
considered in the interest of the United States or at least in his own
interest, do not fly from his political legacy. There are economic reasons
also. The idea of sending 5 million illegal immigrants out of United States is
shortage of labor in all areas of man and woman power which remote cities in US
sourly needs. It does not mean that such concession on the needs of emigrants
is material reasons for appropriating jobs set aside for all asunder and for
general purpose, neither does it mean that social security privileges and
Welfare benefit and Food Stamps are to be expected with assurance given the
tightening of US budgetary requirement. Obviously the 5 million will contribute
to the growth of these United States but to the extent that they understand the
nature of the privilege offered to them as opposed to moral suasion of beating
the system and penetrating its border. They can contribution to the society as
a way to overcome their past. You are here simply put, because your old country
is not better than this country.
More than once, American Presidents have exercised Amnesty
with equal amount of consideration, some of which may be celebrated and others
considered a political treat. If we can look at the historical prism of the
Citizenship, rights of Citizenry, which the goggles of Roman example are
artificial placement of natural rights higher than a non-citizens or Resident,
it become common sense to argue that established societies or formidable
empires with apian ways faced with many illegal migration of peoples of world
into coveted realms, every so often add bit and pieces of their good gestures
to rule by granting Amnesty to these migrants and to non-citizens living in
their realms. For Rome, grant of Citizens and freedom characterized some of the
high points in public service and duty, no less important is the official
pontification of religious assignment. Here in the United States we defer on
one’s religiosity either does it officially matter in choosing to stay here.
The difference lie elsewhere which is why the threats of
eviction was not taken for granted and why certain concerns about emigration
will not end with the permanence of papers. There will be arguments and fights
over the actions by President Obama, but it will be a precedence that should
not lead to blood. We may begin to perform procedure into Obama's physical
speech with extensor ancillary to the time of Christ and head of the Catholic
and Christian Churches, or with the migration of Mohammed into Jeddah from his
home town, that the relapse on Obama’s speeches into the clutches on Bible
makes a second departure from the current problems, itself a child of the
process and second meaning, that the “Scripture tells us that we shall not
oppress a stranger, for we know the heart of a stranger – we were strangers
once, too.”, an onerous consideration that offers as much of necessity as
the factor that others flirting under the canopy of presidential office would
perhaps not have done similar such for the likes of him.
Sometimes these enacted procedural discovery of process
leads to opening gates to Barbarians (a name measured and based in part on some
African tribe), paved the ways for the conquest and failure of the state
especially when allegation of infiltration and pejoration of pastoral
penetration of the empire’s rear was considered Acts of War mingled as conquest
strategy. But here, we doubt that the ambiguity of many Rome and one, is
surpassing to the demands of the American et al, presence and domicile sovereignty,
for it looks like the stories of these United States in comparative association
with Rome, shows even the failure of the State to have granted Amnesty Peter
and some of the disciples including a Roman Citizen such as Paul, did not stop
the large scale revolution on citizenry initiated later by Caracalla son of the
African emperor Septimus Severus. The US is not different, at least Obama – who
is not different from others before him – may be hedging a new page by granting
temporary work license to illegal emigrants, who are asked to be part of a
larger family currently challenged by the past in the course of its future
years.
If like Shakespeare we quote that ‘affections make (us)
false’, the statement is difficult to digest given the presumed consideration
of deporting emigrants in the nearer future by the salutary opponent's party,
that future was injured by the direct actions of the President who may be
looking to cast a weight political blanket on the Republican, whose opposition
and controlling influence at the White House inveigh with meaning on a strategy
taken for granted. From Obama’s speech, we read that. “…we are a nation of
immigrants, we are also a nation of laws. Undocumented workers broke our
immigration laws, and I believe that they must be held accountable – especially
those who may be dangerous. That’s why, over the past six years, deportations
of criminals are up 80 percent. And that’s why we’re going to keep focusing
enforcement resources on actual threats to our security. Felons, not families.
Criminals, not children. Gang members, not a mother who’s working hard to
provide for her kids. We’ll prioritize, just like law enforcement does every
day.” It meets with meaning that actions of that capacity have a staying
power longer than meet its dividend. For statement of this weight no more than
meaning, elevates the rhetoric to a new and possibly avenue. What binds the
President to these emigrants? And why was he vouchsafed by the academic example
of a leading student with illegal parents? Was it a dovetailing of his past and
previous experience or was it a classic meter rendered to transform the new
realities of political force which the Latin Americans have found in the
Republican Party.?
Such painting of the livid core of the indwelling argument
about the loyalties of the immigrants do not pale in comparison to the humble
experiences of President Obama’s father who was accidently granted a chance to
study abroad and was bested by the scholarship he inherited along with some
other Africans through the political years of the late 50’s and 60’s in Africa.
He is not saved by this singular experience in of itself, he is led to consider
the merits of his actions in contest of enveloping new powers at the hands of
the Republicans. Together and apart, the mingling of some of the basic
assumptions about immigration and the legality which the President defended do
not rain hard on why he took the actions in the interest of the country, do not
reach high enough for those who manage our laws for us, for such actions to be
taken beyond prima facia it may point to US defenses, who are currently leading
a charge against Russia without inadvertently sousing an already sensitive
injury. The war on immigration is not fought by US army, the mitigation of working
for those who penetrated US borders is not initiated by US army, the protection
of US borders against unwanted elements is literally the work of the experts;
the military.
Perhaps we have to compensate some of his rhetoric with
lively personal experience only to the extent that the problems of emigration
to United States and the problems of ownership has managed from the late part
of the last decade to re-appear in the United States. President Obama is
therefore seething with permission on his political history, but from actions
he opens himself to political daggers at the White House especially from the
new meaning that Amnesty is not a give-away mirrored from the enterprise of
executive decision, which literally bypassed the political roundtable meeting
for such an exercise. Simply put, Obama acted in sole interest of the country,
which means that actions which he delayed until the last elections, may have
carried far more powerful consequence than the new arithmetic of removing
people from these United States. He tempers this process with magic that the
temporary granting of temporary residency was a general escape from plans not
well known which may not rang through. This action is not mistaken as a
reaction to hints by Republican Majority leader, who is rumored to be working
along with others to have Obama impeached from office.
US of A, is not severely underpopulated but underpopulated
and in every conceivable estimate, we need more people in this Country. Anyone
who is well traveled through these United States will see elements of severely
underpopulated Canada all over it. New York City is Hong Kong and doesn't need
to be, but travel to Albany, a whole State Capital of the State of New York,
and you will surprised at how desperate the town is by 8 pm. Much of Upstate
New York is open wilderness of snowflakes in the winter. There is nothing up
there saving for some specific areas where people live and animals of kinds end
running at the upcoming vehicles. This is supposed to be State of New York will
the glitters of immigrants, let alone neighboring State of Connecticut and New
Jersey. However, the majority of immigrants entering the US in the last 20
years and especially the last 10 years are mostly South Americans. They have
their contribution in construction jobs which no one can take from them, but
let’s face it, this move by President Obama is generally expected to be largely
challenged by Americans, including if not especially White-European Americans,
who are socially facing new challenges with these people from South America and
from Mexico. Some of us wonder if Mexicans for instance can be persuaded to
dump Spanish as a language of choice for American English as language of
originality, for all that these people did and have done in last in the 6 (Six)
centuries was to make their way to Mexico, first as immigrants including
Hernandez Cortes, then as militants against Montezuma and the land has since
been theirs by speech.
President Obama is left no choice but to endorse of the
graft committee recommendations for immigration without compromising his own
position, police, military and National position. The crux of the problem is
not immigration or prepended loss of jobs, but the attitude of these people in
America, especially the future role of language. Is there a future where we
have two Americas, one Spanish and the other English? Are we doing away with
democracy by accommodating bi-cultural, bi-racial, bi-lingual tendencies
instead of multi-lingual, cultural, racial, etc, country since bi-lingual
permeation of social America creates a-two America which exponentially endows
Spanish speakers and propertied Latino with all the new privileges and job
opportunities in names of bi-lingual, but delineates other Americans. This is
the main event of American cultural and immigration reforms - not the people or
the population size. For all we know, Houston Texas is toast no small pretenses
to new emerging two Americas in one Country and it seems to the best of us,
that a hint of conquest broods from this civil blind-folding of America. This
is the main problem.
According to some Aryan theology, ‘two language is evil’ and
if one is wandering how Rome replaced Greece as a power house despite the
Samnite 120 year wars which was decided in favor of Romans by Greeks, the Nike
that returned to Rome came from Greeks but easily became a Roman signatory a
few decades later. What happened what the use of both languages in Rome and in
Greece and eventually, Latin was the only language. Language as an intellectual
property is resisted as a form of identity which speakers hold with special
interest, for instance, migrants living in the United States for the first
time, do not consider it wise to lose their native language. What however
happens is that a stigma as strong as the peoples of these United States hides
under the garb on speech and language with several interpretation resulting
from accents and dialects. Miguel Unamuno the respected Spanish orator once
asserted that “Language is the blood of the spirit”, given weight of meaning
how any immigrant could either consider themselves English speaking Americans,
and others Spanish speaking.
It is interesting to relive the fact that either English,
Spanish or even French, can be considered native language of the Americans.
These three are not, a mistake which divides and conquers people under the bag
of the past history, whereas in home town of New York, there are social
enclaves that are predominantly Irish and the struggle to keep Gaelic alive,
communities that are predominantly Russian and Police with their levels of
crimes and (Natashas), for instance Brighton Beach also called ‘Odessa-by-sea’.
There are the Little Italy New York, up to Mulberry until dogged in by Chinese
right up their alley from Chinatown further than Canal looking at the dearly
missed Manhattan Bridge. These icons make their presence in New York as new
comers and eventually break even into the State. Little Italy used to be
African Town at the turn of the 19th century including downtown up to Washington
park and Bleecker, a century earlier. These towns and the colossal presence of
Japanese Americans at Main Street Queens New York, Haitians in Carnassial
Brooklyn, Jamaicans in Gun hill and White plains road, Mexican in Roosevelt
Avenue Queens, Koreans in Sunny Side, Puerto Ricans in the Bronx, Spanish in
Harlem, Blacks and African in Harlem, Polish and Russian Jews at Williamsburg,
Polish and Cyrillic at Upstate New York of Albany, Irish and Irish Italians in
Schenectady, etc, arrived fourth, fifth, and sometimes sixth generations ago,
spoke different languages but made it part of their immigration policy to
protect the interest of one language. This language is American English.
We as Americans do not leave in isolation of the world, but
in so far as top nations of the world are concerned, for instance Russia, we
can look a better part of our history by making room for less fortunate
immigrants hiding for right and wrong reason from the law. It is law that
controls the movement of people, some of whom has their intention were
manicured to a point that a nation is forced to weigh the price of individual
benefit from the rest of the Country. If personal pursuit of interest surpasses
the general interest of a nation, there is a Malthusian concern though badly applied.
If measure therefore of many parts of the world such as Russia as the case
should indicate, we are ahead of the curve since from the lips of Putin we
heard him mention that no foreign enclaves are to be found in Russia including
Chinatown characteristic of their partner. Here, we test our flair in being
appreciation when for instance in US, there are more Chinatowns than anywhere
in the world, and each of these towns are decorative of Chinese language and
English mosaic, against the primary interest and wishes of the Country. England
on the other hand is not giving immigrant population any breathing space or
they permitted to climb certain special economic ladders despite what we can
permit ourselves to tolerate. One Country that sees the need to permit a useful
dose of others into their realm and expel people with questionable background
is the United States and all immigrants and their citizenry should look at from
a chance to better the country or import the best possible, to permit its
staying power than make it poorer with abandon as we see in California.
Here we remove from logic, the handicap situation of future
estimate under the canopy of language with other pretensions showing its mark
and verity in is social aspect, an aspect that need to be dead and buried for
any lengthy redoubtable threshold of co-existence is possible, stating clearly
that America in the view of this author need a population two times its current
size, at least half a century from now, that the quota system to electronically
and politically yield section of the country after a presumed imaging – our
image – is an open sabotage on the larger canvass of the country with all the
new and trying premise of United States. Let it manifest from the stables of
President Obama and the doctored view and emphasis on Criminal history, is as
much a controlling influence on the bias of artificially pruning some new
Americans of the struggles and hiding and for their American act and amnesty,
whereas if prune juice is better applied in language and diction of separating
one group from another, for here, the liquidity of interaction between the
component parts is injured by attitude, by apartheid, and by historical acclaim
which the new comers having no definitions for their actions, or lack thereof
of such action emerge a new nation or formidable nation with trying expositions
on language. How pathetic?
In a testimony given by Stephen J. Solarz who was for many
years a member of New York house of Representative, in his testimony titled ‘Official
English; A concession to Nativism’ delivered on May 11TH, 1988, threw
additional light on root carnal of some the opposition to immigration – even
though in the author view, we may not want it but may need it – is that
language may bring people together, it may divide them. According to him,
America may not be expected to be another Tower of Babel or another Quebec, to
have an understanding on the importance of promoting one language. Arguing from
background in New York, he monitored his privileges, saying “I am proud to say
that during a walk through my district, one would hear my constituents speaking
over a dozen languages, including Yiddish, Russian, Hebrew, Greek, Arabic,
Farsi, Polish, Hungarian, German, Spanish, Italian, Haitian Creole, Korean, and
Chinese.” Although the large and nearly colossal migration of South Americans
(Latino) and Spanish Speakers to New York, has more than dwarfed every other
group, to the point that every major instructions are written in both English
and Spanish and almost by force, that it now compels others to grudgingly
question the concession to Spanish that is proving so fatal an instrument in
the death of English or others pursuant of the same language.
Since there are more Jewish people in New York than most people,
it makes a kinder argument on how the Arabs and Arabic speakers would have
looked at the bi-lingua factor of English and Hebrew or Yiddish. The Speaker
equally gave an example, that based on the example from the WWII, that the
advantages of singularity of language was buttressed in the letters sent to
specific key members of the society, many of used English a common banter
against the language of their old countries, that “…the office of War
Information sent out publications in Seventeen different languages – Baltic,
Chinese, Czechoslovakians, Filipino, Finnish, French, German, Greek,
Hungarians, Italians, Japanese, Polish, Portuguese, Scandinavian, Spanish,
Serbo-Croatian, and Yiddish.” Each of these languages didn’t feel stymie when
compared and translated through English and had no specific sense of censorship
since others were receiving the same treatment. If Obama’s speech pointed that
the United States is the country of immigrants, he relives the idea that Uncle
Sam probably needs you and probably has opportunities for you and your gifted
ability, that from history these opportunities has been sabotaged by crime
magnates and syndicates, and has been poisoned by redoubtable national interest
from people lacking faith in the country....
II
This inception of Spanish as a tool for accommodating
immigrants who are still on their way to America, has become a weapon on mass
destruction of American lifestyle and language. It has also created and
threatened to create the culture of two Americans which is most evident in
border town such as my beautiful and hostile San Antonio. It is not that the replacement is a far less
value or poison to the system as others may sanctioned it, but absence of
merits in a society that is not new to apartheid. Such discourses may not be
expected in Obama’s speech, it is below his office, but it is a serious and
cancer ridden poison that need to be treated with its anti-dote. Such issue is
raising some tension that should not be taken for granted, especial in border
towns, who are percepts victims of their past, are doing themselves more harm
like Muslims and their fellowship of Allah, were scattered as the sheep went
their way.
“My fellow Americans, we are and always will be a nation of
immigrants. We were strangers once,
too. And whether our forebears were
strangers who crossed the Atlantic, or the Pacific, or the Rio Grande, we are
here only because this country welcomed them in, and taught them that to be an
American is about something more than what we look like, or what our last names
are, or how we worship. What makes us
Americans is our shared commitment to an ideal – that all of us are created
equal, and all of us have the chance to make of our lives what we will.”
Obama’s speech (fox news transcript)
Walter Huddleston former Senator of Kentucky speaking to a
joint session on the impact of language in American life, mentions that “But
for the last fifteen years, we have experienced a growing resistance to the
acceptance of our historic language, an antagonistic questioning of the melting
pot philosophy that has traditionally helped speed newcomers into the American
main stream.” If we may comment on this speech away from Obama’s recent speech,
there is no such thing as ‘historic language’ in America, we become as we are
part of a growing cultural of deference whose motivation in New American came
through the Dutch, the English or Anglo-Saxons, the Scots who came later, the
Irish as well, the Germans, Scandinavians, Italians and even the French, all
speaking a language closer to English language but hints of separation
especially from Latin, that English language was not chosen as a traditional
language, it was the only possibly language of the New Americans from former
territories called New Amsterdam and so on, who waged some war against Indians
in Pennsylvania and to the territory in New York, and accepted English language
as the formal expression language including the French, that at the time of
their arrival in the South, even Spanish exceptions to the course took on the
language. English was considered a formal language of the people and by people
ahead of an equally majority French but were done in by the Dutch and Scandinavians
in the North. People also spoke a different dialect and with accent in US, it
is due to the influence of more than one language which their closest spoke and
which added sound to the speakers, sometimes with a second meaning. The senator
from Kentucky also hinted that “The unfortunate result is that thousands of
immigrants and non-immigrant children are languishing in near-permanent
bilingual – bicultural programs, kept in a state of prolonged confusion,
suspended between two worlds, and not understanding what is expected of them.”
Well Doc, this is not our problems or my problem, employers can hire whoever
they so choses but no one should raise our children for you. Above all, it may
further remain a problem as someone said, more than half of the newly promoted
in office in the election were voted from 2010, many of them Spanish speakers
and Latinos.
We may not say this is exactly the case in the United
States, or would be the case in future, but the fatal grounds lost in the
United States and the erosion of its primal traditions in California and in
some parts of Texas, is not without the express importation and doubling up of
foreign language. If we are concerned about the expansion of South Americans
who have replaced African Americans are the second largest population block in
less than 20 years, we may help ourselves in narrating that in so far as Asians
are concerned, whose population make up a third of total human beings on earth,
they are the future demographic of these United States, that say an African
Country alone is three times that size of everyone in Caribbean, we are really
looking at dangerous precedent, since the total population of the
Caribbean-American who are reasonably close to the border do not begin to
challenge the wealth of human trespassing with notice with Mexicans and with
the rest of the Central Americans.
I for one, do think that Mexico has a lot to say about
United States, and in my view should be prevented from reaching the States. But
when they reach, there is no way of asking them to return. My argument is not
new, it has been used by others, my argument is that some countries cannot
removed from United States, does not mean that they are continues routing of
these United States since even Canadians who share border with United States
are not easily allowed to the States. In this case, it looks like traveling
from Mexico to United States is a problem developed from their cultural
attitudes than anything else. There is an ownership bracket which still means that
the wealth of material information of people moving from Canada – many of whom
are Mexicans to United States – have reached new levels, but the precedence its
now given a new and striking interpretation when English for instance in
Houston for in United States no longer serve a regular newspaper saving the
Chronicle. This deliberate murder of English language is not obviously the
murder of American way of life or challenge or opposition to it, but the
replacing psychology of some of the deeply held conceptions about a society,
its opulence, its respect of laws which has seen both the blacks and the whites
go at each other, it’s no even considered in parts of Texas, these US laws do
not apply to these new brand of emigrants.
That’s the problem. Many of these bi-lingual tigers control
not only the English speaking aspect and as far rooms are created in Welfare
and minority exercise of income distribution is concerned, they are cornered in
names and practicality of bi-lingual – if to say, for instance, that these jobs
are for Spanish and Latino speaking only and for the rest of you. With more
Asian entering the Americans every day, and more population question arise, it
is common sense that a good example about the laws of these Country is given a
new and interpreted meaning, that majority of the leading population block, are
to show example that if there is one America, two America is prolegomena to
several Americans, and the house will in future be divided and of course in
steed of Abraham Lincoln citing the Bible, that such house or this ‘house will
not stand.’ For all magical intent of reasoning which the age of the past
empires; how they fared, how they worked and failed, affords the question,
whether or not we that have made it to these United States or born here as the
case may be, are part of the older entity that brought us for which we must
remain loyal, or we are part of the decimal number that the amounts to a new
nation – with or without the definitions of the boiling pot.
A boiling pot from embers of American history to the stigma
of African American lives, is a question of survival tendencies of those
enumerated here, for if there is no boiling point as defined in current status
quo or if there is such status quo as boiling point, does is change over time
by addition of new cultures and people from the rest of the world, or does it
have to be replaced in its entirely with new approaches, forms of speaking and
exercise of languages which others don’t speak in the official management of
the least corners of these United States? I think, a standing boiling is one
that accommodates others, one that transforms itself, one that is capable to
retaining its essence or whatever presumed essence the new reality of other
arrivals means, but in here, far from other unreal circumstances that has
bedeviled American Cities and lives, some basic tenet should not be replaced or
status quo open to challenges. That one, the use or abuse of US constitution is
not for a specific people however intolerable some of the assumptions are and
the extent of its application which gives in and out at Court and in the Street
as usually mated out by those holding the power and the weapon, that these are
humans are acceptable, that these people make mistakes are acceptable, that the
norms and baring limits of the application of process is the determinative of
all nomenclature associated with it. The varying interpretations of the laws
and constitution is not removed from the comparing that is keeping to a
bi-lingual recourse, however unpromising some of the delivered responses are,
it looks from all intent, that the funk with laws and the Americans
constitutions begins and ends with attritions based on race, color, gender,
religion, and very not dangerous of them all, language.
If we all in future
agree to speak Spanish or Latin given a swell of demand for it, it can said,
that the constitution need to be interpreted in such language, if it should
then the anthem must also be broken and translated and spoken in Spanish. Not
in future of the nation which is a current condition definition looking
forward, but in the meaning of the few institution that protect that the very
inch of the country which is defined not by its past, but in the current
discourses prevailing by the day. Such as a country may not take into account
the new realities arrived from elsewhere by others, but needs them to see that
moving to United States is an attempt to elevate some of the best reserves of
the old country, that there is nothing wrong in using the language of the old
country – that in fact American welcomes it, the majority of the confusion and
the trouble with new people adjusting in America is how easily they rubbish the
status quo by entertaining the features from past lives or denying, and replacing
in the new lands of the Americans with old systems no longer as ease even in
the old Country.
I take it that the discontinues availing of the
circumstances surrounding the formative States such as California and Texas,
New Mexico and Arizona, the wars with Spanish Army based in Mexico and employer
of Mexicans situated in what was a disputed territory of Alamo, does not begin
to levitate that Texas or California and the four mentioned states were all
Mexican States. There is no denying that parts of Texas seem in many ways than
one a part claimed by Hidalgo (Guadalupe) as a turf, but did not historically
mean that it was in meanest of historical imagination Spanish or Mexican, it
was not, hence the real reasons for the war. What became United States added these
territory because it was illegally occupied, initially by a combination of
run-away slaves and natives, and other who sought the land armistice. There is
no denying that some of the assumption about these territories and why from
experience many immigrants cast a long view on the South is from this
misdiagnosed view of the past history of the United States. Such view may now
and in time to come be considered anti-American and nearly saboteur by the
standards of Word Wars, given that the black themselves and their Marranos,
including people of manifest destiny, Apache left overs, Jewish families from
Spain and Netherlands some of the names of these families are still the record
of Texas States and other migrant Mexican with long chain families in Texas and
across, no longer apply and no longer have a personalized states in these
founded areas but lived it till the continental army, still has no say since
the intifada at the formative early and late Klansmen ages in Texas and parts
of California essentially abated with gold rushers. We therefore suggest that
the history of these areas which has seen the largest population explosion may
and may have added to the growing insistence of the use of Spanish language,
which for deliberate opportunity of power insist and use the language, are part
of the social restlessness with some of the immigrants who are actually
hardworking.
The old maps assumed to have represented a portion of the
Country once owned by Mexico for a start and who in the company of others following
their lead dream with a vanishing grasp of remaking the State with levels of
actuary that has kept others in denial, may be demised since even the very
names of the States is truly Spanish closer to Teixeira than Tehocas but
ultimately a separate identity, mitigate on some historical claims even to the
rest of the country. The old maps may or
may not contained lines of the past, but the area for Texas subtends on the tip
of Alamo and parts of San Antonio, no to the lands eventually associated with
Stephen F. Austin where black soldiers initially made their home and who helped
to purchase from the Spanish a healthy portion of San Antonio and the Alamo was
a second matter. For all intents of academic exercises, these assumptions have
new meanings, ay have led to the dangerous levels of bi-lingual application of
process or method of excision, which in California has forwarded a new but
diminished State regarded by many as a third world. It looks like the
embarkation of some of the bi-lingual using and its soft embouchure for others
without Spanish background dogs on both parties with marginal view that a
society and its championing of the forward resources in the global are
seriously challenged and severely handicapped as if a part of the Country is be
default foreign nation, a two-kind of nation whose evidence is the disappearing
of the old with something less appealingly.
If Obama is looking to placate the rest of the nation on the
merit of his exercises given the predated moves in parts of Louisiana and
Florida, in New Mexico and Arizona, of removing any body of suspicions
physicality and accent, and profiling such persons with direct intent at
exporting, he should focus on ending the public use of English and Spanish in
any form and any means, either for public consumption or for free planning of
the public works, for as long this invested language barrier which is sensitive
to barriers in constitution is stayed and not labeled Civil violation of
others, then Obama’s Amnesty is not on the same categories as others in major
empires before him.
No comments:
Post a Comment