By
Sampson Iroabuchi Onwuka
How does it end and when does the BID for Crude oil begin? Looking at the shoddy details of Crude oil and the expectations that crude oil is likely to drop to $40 it’s is an institutional investors’ dream. But the idea that a peak oil in June at $115 for Brent has a staying power reaching to $150. This is not the case, $150 per barrel is not nearly the case and Brent has a chance of returning on high by 2015, perhaps not a $150 a barrel given US defensive and dynamic weighting on Social Security. The debacle that has visited the market took many traders by surprise and they were surprise to see market end at a very low rate this year, whipping out all of the gains in some EU industries this year alone. US market is equally affected, at least by the extra profit it earns by this time of the year which now stagnates, perhaps due to the release of excess capacity by OPEC which is struggling with amount and not rate OPEC is still threatening to consider its supply when the prices drop to $40, but this timing may not come since at $50 Crude oil is perhaps a good buy but at $57 and at December 15th, 2014, we are not sure when this buy will exactly begin. We may look at the incident in many of world and how they are shaping the end of Crude oil shedding or the cause of it, from (1) Russia, the Economic Sanctions by NATO, EU and US is red face on its International Complex. Russian Banks signaled in October that when crude oil prices fall below $60 they will intervene. As such it seems that Russia is not immune to the problems of crude oil and energy has taken new and direct forms in the United States in the World. The crisis of 1998 that saw contraction reaching into Asia are still reasonably fresh, but then as well now, we may regard the role of India and China as very important, large for (2) China, whose presence in Global market is well known and everywhere seen, above all, but the instability in Russia that is facing crisis and China that are dealing with inflation calls for a new translation, does not translate into the forces mitigating against the Crude oil market. We have also forgotten some efforts made by China in reducing their dependency on Crude Oil, while they were making business contacts with Nigeria off-shore drilling oil, China was trying to acquire Unocal, attempted to also buy a section of Russian STU, the two deals where restrained saving a new partnership in Gas in Russia which finally came through a few years ago. But in Africa, Chinese are Uganda, in Angola, in Ghana, in Kenya, and in Sudan, all with duplicated Crude oil refinery equipment. Over time, there will be less reliance on these areas for Crude Oil since with happy face China is really sabotaging these industries.
Sampson Iroabuchi Onwuka
How does it end and when does the BID for Crude oil begin? Looking at the shoddy details of Crude oil and the expectations that crude oil is likely to drop to $40 it’s is an institutional investors’ dream. But the idea that a peak oil in June at $115 for Brent has a staying power reaching to $150. This is not the case, $150 per barrel is not nearly the case and Brent has a chance of returning on high by 2015, perhaps not a $150 a barrel given US defensive and dynamic weighting on Social Security. The debacle that has visited the market took many traders by surprise and they were surprise to see market end at a very low rate this year, whipping out all of the gains in some EU industries this year alone. US market is equally affected, at least by the extra profit it earns by this time of the year which now stagnates, perhaps due to the release of excess capacity by OPEC which is struggling with amount and not rate OPEC is still threatening to consider its supply when the prices drop to $40, but this timing may not come since at $50 Crude oil is perhaps a good buy but at $57 and at December 15th, 2014, we are not sure when this buy will exactly begin. We may look at the incident in many of world and how they are shaping the end of Crude oil shedding or the cause of it, from (1) Russia, the Economic Sanctions by NATO, EU and US is red face on its International Complex. Russian Banks signaled in October that when crude oil prices fall below $60 they will intervene. As such it seems that Russia is not immune to the problems of crude oil and energy has taken new and direct forms in the United States in the World. The crisis of 1998 that saw contraction reaching into Asia are still reasonably fresh, but then as well now, we may regard the role of India and China as very important, large for (2) China, whose presence in Global market is well known and everywhere seen, above all, but the instability in Russia that is facing crisis and China that are dealing with inflation calls for a new translation, does not translate into the forces mitigating against the Crude oil market. We have also forgotten some efforts made by China in reducing their dependency on Crude Oil, while they were making business contacts with Nigeria off-shore drilling oil, China was trying to acquire Unocal, attempted to also buy a section of Russian STU, the two deals where restrained saving a new partnership in Gas in Russia which finally came through a few years ago. But in Africa, Chinese are Uganda, in Angola, in Ghana, in Kenya, and in Sudan, all with duplicated Crude oil refinery equipment. Over time, there will be less reliance on these areas for Crude Oil since with happy face China is really sabotaging these industries.
Obviously, having OPEC release its
spare and excess capacity at a rate not exactly seen before may be their way of
dealing with US interest rate which has remained low for a long time. But this
is only speculative since a Karen Ward of HSBC has indicated that Saudi Arabia
may be better off with a reasonable priced crude oil to balance the budget. Reading
through a popular Oil.NET popular sources by Steven Austin, he arranged some of
the reasons why there are short falls in Crude oil prices, that ISIL disrupted
production of Crude oil in Iraq, which some expert interpreted a spike on Crude
oil prices, but Austin mention that people following the local news would have
seen that “IS controls the central region of Iraq and eastern parts of Syria.
All of Iraq's oil is in the Shia-populated southern Basra region of Iraq and
the Kurdish region in the north of Iraq. IS has imposed a rule of terror across
vast tracts of desert in the only region of Iraq that has little oil.” These
meant that they were selling the coveted Crude Oil to whoever wanted to buy and
did so without undue attention to the market. In reality, the short falls in
Crude oil may have alerted OPEC countries including Nigeria and Venezuela and
to some extent Libya to cut down on their number of production, but the effects
can from somewhere else. There is however a second factor which Steve Austin
mentioned that may have influenced the consumptive behavior of world markets
especially those of US, that in 2005, US was still importing 60% of Crude oil,
but since Obama and US dependency on foreign crude oil and gas has fallen to
30%. There are new and newer planned production hot spot in Alaska and North
Dakota, and Wyoming has also re-opened for drilling. These ventures, especially
the plans to begin Alaska’s Crude Oil, took Saudi Arabia that acted against the
future trend of these dependence on foreign crude oil. We leave it as it
appears that OPEC is not totally in control of its resources and some crude oil
is reaching the world markets through other windows not necessarily under the
canopy of Saudi Arabia.
II
Part of the reasons why there is
such a drop in US interest rate is perhaps to discourage the flooding of US
market with sovereign wealth, an argument, it is also a relapse into an
investment for the future from outside given the shocking gap in US overall
individual savings. US Feds are not helping, they are privately owned with
enough matching currency from the US Government, how much faith the US economy
has on it’s relative to the performances of the Banks. But with the Feds buying
as much they have from the Federal Government; Bonds, etc., they deny private
placement on US securities which are not usually advisable when they exceed a 2
year. 30 year bellwether are usually left to the Federal Reserve or some big
financial institution to handle. The problem with FEDs and big financial
institutions is that they like the US treasuries are the generally keep of
foreign Sovereign Wealth, that is a Country like Nigeria can invest in the US
Federal Reserve through its crude oil market with a less than 1.5% profit over
the next 30 years or thereabout. The other issue which many nations are not
aware of is that the money is received in cash and is paid in the same amount
when the securities expires. As such Nigerian Sovereign Wealth in US at $60
billion are only applied to debt owed by Nigeria to business registered through
FDIC and others. Of course, in the life of these bonds and investment which the
Feds are chief players, a lot of money switch hands between Europe and the
United States, between United States and Asia such China and Japan who are the
Americans largest IOU credit countries. With half the resources at the disposal
of US Banks they essentially guarantee the life of the FEDS through their
business interest in the United States. Left to the rest of the world and the
institutions that can make any meaningful contribution, the major issue that
are taken into context is the rate of debt repay which the Nations based on
standard Crude oil or similar cash crop must meet in order to balance their
budget at home and return of investment through debt which is difficult when
Crude oil are refineries involved fall below market and expected rate. For
instance, when Nigeria and any other International economies in the world buy
into a business with a turnkey solution in Nigeria, for instance, the building
of dams and electrical power stations in most remote places in Nigeria, either
as an IMF industry or a business concierge, they inherit a debt when the Crude
oil is perhaps selling at $70 and $80 a barrel and with US interest rate low
are able to service their loans. But these international countries such as
Nigeria could experience serious problems of repay when US interest rate begins
to climb as it is due for 2015. Yet, the major event preceding these events are
the failure of US to meet and balance budget without shifting its grounds on
trade deficit. US trade deficit with low crude oil pricing is possible and may
shift to surpluses as opposed to high price of crude oil.
Karen Ward ‘HSBC’ Senior Economist (Oct. 22 2014) ‘Economic of Falling
Crude oil prices’ argues that short falls in Crude Oil prices may help
countries such as
“In Saudi Arabia, for example, a $20 a barrel oil price would have balanced
the budget in 2003 but in 2015 we estimate it will require $90 to cover its
increased spending. Bahrain’s and Iran’s breakeven oil price is likely to be
above $130 a barrel next year. Indeed, below $90, only the UAE, Kuwait and
Qatar Cwould have budget surpluses in 2015.”
“With no other ready sources of income, and spending commitments
difficult to reshape, the deterioration in fiscal performance that comes with
sustained declines in oil prices is sharp. At $70, for example, we estimate
that Saudi Arabia’s budget shortfall would approach 10% of GDP next year; at
$50, the deficit could exceed 15%.”
“However, the regional producers, which together account for more than 30%
of global oil supply and, critically, 80% of OPEC output, have generated such
large surpluses over the past decade that they have the balance-sheet strength
to deal with lower-than-expected oil income.”
III
But at this period in the trade
fare, we look at what happens to Nigeria and International Oil Rich countries
when crude oil falls to $50 a barrel. With increases in interest rate and fund
rate given the 1.1 trillion loans which are not service loans or loans to
create money, we see an America that may have added a I trillion to its debt on
one hand, but may be balancing its budget and trade deficit to somewhere below
2% from somewhere in 9%. In the first two quarters of early 2015, there are
possibly signs that US may be hitting a surplus, which makes the argument lame
and clear, that perhaps, US stock market is not without buying interest especially
the Crude Oil. I take it that countries such as Nigeria and say Mexico, part of
the new kids on the block – may become new kids on the chopping block should
they scale their interest rate to US given the gaps in economic maturity, and
far from what is happening in West Africa with Nigeria as Satellite, it may
have a later day solution from the hands of Concentric Circles. A concentric
economic circle involves a corporation between several countries in the world
that share similar economic outputs.
Let us reverse the mention of the
BRICS countries is what is now happening to Crude oil which is subordinate to
International guarantees and to BRIC countries, that for instance the free
market entreaties of Russia or its return to prime time, then China remaining
free from International contamination and so also India, Brazil and South
Africa. These nations are not strong consumption economies in spite of their
size, that if look at the role of AIG in these countries parallel to what is
available in the New group of MINT, which show life and dying attitude if not
taken seriously. Of course, Indonesia like Mexico may not suffer from the
problems that the BRICS may be bound to in the International market, but we can
be sure that their lack of satellite placement and lack of comparative scaling
for interest rate and rate of FDI is depended on how well it does with US. But
Mexico is not US, and relapsing into US which torching on Canada or far away
countries such as South Africa or Egypt or very cogent and realized bases, may
be ridden to the permeable elements of inflation which are exported with a rise
in US interest rate, that Mexico currencies will face the same faith in
suffered in the past given its stand-alone structure to the US. With a
structure measured through similar progressive countries such as Brazil or
South Africa or perhaps Indonesia or to a large extent Turkey, it will scale
down its bifurcation to US and will add more green to US invested interest when
it came share its inflationary pressure through an International market, for
instance the MINT countries, Mexico, Indonesia, Nigeria and Turkey, that even
to the extent of having similar currency may help to save them from a combined
famine which an International market will experience under a rising US. The
first signs of some problems with 2015 is the shortfalls in Indonesian and
rupiah selling at 1.9% below its market will
bring to the table the problems of next year poised for interest rate. Carefully
looking at the price Obama’s estimates are troubling, not that he is doing
anything from his head, but going as late as 1970 when US was in this kind of
situation, or middle rate as 1979, when crude oil prices reached a new premium,
thing gradually fall apart as we entered in the earliest 80’s.
Indonesia, Turkey, China, Japan,
Taiwan, Malaysia are element of business families that have graced the
venturesome business partnership with Nigeria, all of these countries is the
delineating years of Nigerian military administration itself a consequence and
continuing evidence of a country or a nation in disarray or a showing of
instability, from 70-75, 83-91, forcing Nigerian into long list of indebtedness
tied to Oil companies and their spurious deals with OPEC oil International,
whose final coming and repay scythe was a damage to the currency of these
Nigerians. Today we may speak of a new co-operative indicia of MINT Coined by
Jim ; composing of Mexico, Indonesia, Nigeria and Turkey, a grouping that
alarmed the best of us since we are certain that Nigeria is only half awake
from almost two decades of military dictatorship. If these four countries
aspire stability especially through the currency, which is very important it
may be meeting to scale their interest rate along the participating countries with
perhaps a side note on Crude Oil. These countries commercially generate over 1
trillion dollars in GNP with Mexico nearing 1.7 trillion year to year, several
hundred million behind Texas alone not adding California with over 2.3 trillion
GDP. Nigerian from the list is lowest performing economy with only a few
international measure of structural development to compare with Turkey and to
some extent Mexico and Indonesia, where as Indonesia is clearly the largest
market in the four in spite of its numbers. Mexico that is luckiest of all them
suffers from similar high fate and ending, for if put the balkanization of
Mexico Peso in the 1980’s and 90’s, we become weary if the new signs of
depreciation will continue and for how long. Mexican Peso selling at 14.4 to 1
dollar is already showing signs of decay from just a decade and half since the
inception of the new currency. It looks like the correlation of Mexican peso to
dollars was a function of the export market, with US being the Chief ends of
these exports. The issue of cost labor proved too quick an advantage but in
receding years from 1993, the currency has gradually slipped to original
challenges.
Bill Barnhart Market Report in
1995, reflected on a parallel quote from the Dec. 4, 1985, by Wall Street Journal: that Mexico “Today, instead
of being a model for other nations, Mexico is a lesson in how at similar
to Russia today that is offering over 17% interest rate is call for cash,
leading peoples of the world including Mexicans to checker their savings and
buy into the US. The damage is important, for to some Mexicans, the mistakes on
the past may not be repeated in 2015. But this is not the case. As long as US
interest rate remain this expensive at less 1% meaning don’t bother we flooding
the market too quickly, Mexico may be save, to a point that a return rate
through Crude Oil guarantee sustained supply of dollars, but with short falls
on Crude oil, we can be certain that Mexico can’t keep up with servicing its
Peso. Part of the reason is lack of international anchor and the reputation
that Mexico enjoins. With interest rate taking a hike in US – at least up to 2%
we may begin to see visible problems with the Peso and when it reaches a
barrier of no return it mainly becomes too expensive to do business in Mexico
with hundreds of peso to the dollar.
Money Market Interest Rates and
Mortgage Rates, 1980–2002 |
Apparently, supply as the economist
Says mentioned could create its own demands, means that the erosion of the
peso’s significance in the global macro was reduced to a banter with the
states. With US trade deficit at all-time low and only one state, Texas,
generating more money than Mexico combined, the real problems therefore is what
the quality of the Mexican markets, which without international baskets, has no
more meaning that the actions from prices as from US which is poised to raise
its rate. I will bait any Mexican or Chicano that if US pushes up 2% interest,
additional US capital will move from Mexico into US, it will create a negative
balance sheet, a problem of inflation and the Peso in 16 months from here on,
will dip 20 pesos for a dollar. Here is the conundrum, that as much as US is
the Sun of world markets and satellites countries such as China who cannot
really blame take their rest in the US and its economic sheltering, the human
quality once an item quite severe with cross-border economics, not has little
meaning saving through prices. In essence, the more we have countries in the
world including the BRICS, create an economic conditioning that represses
Foreign Direct Investment, the more into US for a kind of value which generate
real income very fast. However when crisis come as they look in December of
2014, it could be driven by other reasons and things in the process, but in
all, it could be driven by the lack of other sun states in the Global macro.
That is to suggest that the depression of a Nigerian Naira, an Indonesian
Rupiah, Turkish Lirah (who are accused of supporting IS by buying crude oil
through them), and Mexican peso, will continue to decline unless interest rate
its low and low for a very long time in US. Even at that, the cost of
expansion, whose failures in Mexico was well received elsewhere means that the
peso has no anchor anywhere
else.
Yet Nigeria is half a trillion in
GNP with a few negligible sparing from other West African countries who account
for a large percentage of new investment. In the long run, Nigeria may offer
growth opportunity to West Africans, but they will continue buy Naira with US
hard saved currency to offset, some of the shedding of the Naira. But it is
their role as a regional economic headgear to demonstrate market direction in
West Africa which should dominate the outlook of Business in nearer future. Some
of the new investment in Nigeria also came through Europe, and here we can say
that, EU moving back to its sources and dollars re-migrating to US when it does
not need to, devalues the stock market and further forces interesting parties
to escort their currency out of Nigeria. It takes toll of its value system and
not really US’s fault, it makes it seem that US is avoiding loses whereas
Nigeria like progressive International Country such as Mexico, or Indonesia,
did not take advantage of low interest rate which China essentially buried
itself into. In all compulsive understanding on how a process of that kind is
resolved, we compare the problems of anchor and bifurcation to US and a
primitive example of assuring a future for Mexico. Since 1994 it does not need to,
it had opportunity then and now to enter new economic horizons which a MINT if
their interest rates are scalable and a meeting surplus of the member countries
are evident, then it may have crowd investment did not need to interfere with
its future estimate as with the US market.
Whereas these Countries in
comparative relationship with other groups of growing economy offer assortment
of market and business interest, particularly in the areas of crude oil and in
the area of paired resources especially for Mexico with both the opulence and
resources to hold to their new found optimism in a shadow of new world market
order. The argument is not that Nigeria cannot belong to this group given the
structural weight of their industries, they have a shining example in Turkey
but in terms of the penetration of businesses it is Indonesia, with Indonesia
ahead of Philippines with higher mid-income earners and population exceeding
150 million (170 million), and these countries such as the Philippians and
Indonesia are both English speaking countries which these days is just a
normative and may be useful in delivering the market with comparable rate in
resources between these countries and parts of them that speak French……
In respect to Mexico, it has a
pairing through oil, a communication problem of history and language – that for
Nigerians some idea easily Mexican in meaning is quite a mouth foul – and in
respect to language, Spanish speakers or Latin Americans are almost unheard
off. But these are temporary issue given their experience in dealing with US
and Canada. But in form and in need, the scale of preference should place
Mexican interest in Africa on a playing field such as Angola, not that Mexico
need less penetration of its oil field, but in compact with OPEC which Mexico
is not nearly part of, its presence in Africa gives a breathing space and may
in the end save it from sinking further down with inflation since 1993 on its
new currencies.
Whether or not Nigeria belongs with
this MINT group is not a financial article, it is however important to point
out that the country has a long history and the current new development in
Nigeria is hardly the brighter days which for many economist is somewhere
between the 70’s after the end of civil wars and sometime in the 80’s when the
military returned to office. The economic progress in Nigeria and in the 80’s
are still visible including factories which were built by Nigerians with some
sparing from those left by the English and Dutch in the 60’s. These factories
due to civil strife in the country fell into disrepute putting some dumb-ass
clog in the wheels of the economic progress following a population that was
expanding exponentially. The only remedy was the exchange rate which gave
return of interest and investment to Nigerian business groups, all of these
could not last given the increase in prices in doing business in Nigeria and
West Africa, and with the Dutch system of matching Nigerian Debt to Oil
Companies who fumbled military experts in Nigeria into signing documents left
Nigeria indebted with cash call furnishing from banks that entered Nigeria
through oil companies creating more and more problems for the exchange rate and
in the end, the currency spread was so wide that Nigeria was called an economic
crisis. It took long and practiced intents of newly elected Nigerians to
gradually grind these forces to a halt, including the extra-ordinary effort by
the Ngozi Okonji-Iweala, who asked through World Bank that the debt should be
pardoned.
But in terms of material resources
of South Africa and their highly indulgent attitude to business which is
meeting for Asia Tigers, more responsible and complete given their levity to
Europe and American opulence, their nomination into the BRIC as equal to BRICS
is good and bad news, mostly good news since it savors South African entrenched
mineral resources in the conceived and deceptive nudging of China who
introduced South Africa to the BRIC and for the fact they have a better meme to
settle against these Nigerians, their role was expanded. There are no degrees
of possibilities for these countries to deal with South Africa, although South
Africa is not Nigeria is attitude to business, it has healthy and very
experienced traditional business environment that are not far behind any nation
on earth including building nuclear energies, but are trapped along the lines
of 1% super rich, poorer south Africans now in power, and are smaller markets
compared to Nigeria. South Africa is truly a BRIC, it can manufacture anything
for European and US industries and responsible for some of new line of green
light in Nigeria and Ghana.
There are several reasons behind
the possibility of the breakdown in business relationship between Nigeria and
these countries, especially Japan and Taiwan in the inception of Nigerian
Electrical Power Authority (NEPA) and comparative quality of these co-operative
countries in the 70”s to Nigeria. Their currency rates were much higher than it
eventually became a few years later. In the earlier possibly imaginations of
Nigeria struggling under the canopy of West African economies, it looks like
the success of even the nearest Franco neighbors; Cameroun, Togo, Benin, and
Niger, all surrounding Nigeria, including distant Gabon, found market Nigeria
for their products making its way from France and production economies in the
World. These the growth in West African countries is so zero that the gap now
enjoyed between some Asia Tigers and Nigeria is not saved by the breaching of
these gaps by South Africa. We may look for the reasons why there was such
breakdown of business relationship between China and Nigeria in direct and
active business co-existence in terms of the every other business of interest
other primary government arrangement, or
for Taiwan its mouthpiece for long, to have been a problem derived from all…
It must be said that Nigeria from
its earlier years has always stressed the importance of its currency, and from
those earlier years until fairly recently, it has tried its hands with various
means of managing its currency including the occasional attempt at reprinting
its notes to stem the tide of laundry. Some of these measures seem to have
worked their miracles but not all the time, and presently, we are dealing with
some problems which deserve the attention of all our well-wishers. But in the
currency cut throat business and its 'Currency War' of nations, no country can
better advice Nigerians than Nigerians. It is obvious and large by the extent
of buying indulgent charisma of re-telling of what happens to a green basket
from mature can as they turn yellowish with time maturing into the brown
baskets from cane. If you are lucky in getting to experience the transition
evident in the general life of a green basket since the usual process is that
it leads to something and perhaps an end. Africa history especially these new
nations are perhaps not that different.
Miscellaneous
People driven by necessity would do
what’s necessary to meet demands. But here, as we have argued, mineral and hard
resources for Nigerian market are no foreign, and can be located in strange
abundance in Nigeria which now mentions that the reasons why there was problem
is the poor showing of Nigerian market in the world. Even with new industries
in Cement for instance opening up in many parts of the country it is not enough
at all to effectively meet demands even at a very high price. What a potential
for consumption that Nigeria has for world markets, which for its reason and
the reasons for new African frontiers since the Colonial eras if not through
the slave trade era, that a country may look the promise of offering a market
to goods reaching Africa or good manufactured from anywhere in Africa including
South Africa. It may seem that the lack of standard shipyards are problems
encountered in many part of the world, that Nigeria could better resolve with
some attitude of how begin their help-yourself projects, projects that will
co-inside with opportunities to dump on Nigerian markets as long their turn key
investment with direct yield from debt investment categories. It leads here
that the rate at which this could be realized will have do away with military
past, for sure, many African countries, especially West African would find it
comforting to re-issue their own overnight lending with Crude oil as basis for
conversion to Nigerian currency, that as much as currency can flow from US,
China, and Europe, where Africans, Nigerians (Nigerian Americans) in particular
work for in odd jobs far below their rated certiorari can look at Crude oil as
a banter in world markets, in channeling the amount of currency that could
migrate to Africa. US penetration of Nigeria is counted through currency sent
through Banks and Western Union, the currency is by itself a commodity – no
different from any other product – that if migrates from one areas of the
border another, it dictates the market where it essentially sees the light of
translation and exchange. In such cases,
the idea of price as a function of the market or price of a function of a
currency rate is give new meaning, that the currency wars between any foreign denomination
against a local one when a banter such as Crude oil for Nigerian case or a
banter such as common market item is no longer at ease.
The currency when not accounted for
mitigates the local currencies leading for instance more Mexicans Pesos to
redeem itself from other in-flock material currency or money laundered from
Asia, US and Europe. Here for explicating deist, the idea of money laundering
includes money simply not accounted for, whereas trade-deficit is a shift from
equilibrium and the degree of that shift from the acceptable concept of x, y,
z, which matters in names of black market and in names of shadow banking, that
must be held to remain in the balance with the local exchange route unless
there is a mitigation……
Once more justifying some action
chiefly motivated by money is placing a latch on the door made of papers. It is
hardly the case that we may question some of the assumptions in the businesses
of these foreigners in Africa or others in Asia and in Europe, or in reverse,
people who visit some parts of world for private interest have their reasons
for doing so. What we may argue is that the business interest and styles may
differ, people may differ but generating income and benefit is sine qua non of
co-existence, that efforts of any group of nations or continents in any part of
world towards a future should be held together along the lines of the economic
co-operatives, adding the protections of Commerce from rapacious attitude of
the general public. It is here that the word I for disequilibrium and thou
for attempt at economic equilibrium leads us to compare to what extent, say a
new market with a helpful serving premise in West Africa could help generate an
unforeseeable stability that necessary for growth in the Continent of Africa or
how the regional franchise of their demand and supply market is buttressed
elsewhere – either in some parts of the deeper SEA (South East Asia) or with
some capacity enabled by reason that what may be achieved through scalability
of Interest rate in North America or in Europe. Reading through Europe
pamphlets for regional belter weight for African economic environment and
business society, we cannot fail to have noticed that part of the heavily
edited pamphlet is proof of their capacity to farm the region as part of the
older exercised economic practices of extending European goods through trade
fair and money function that they are scaled through overnight lending. It may
seem that these pamphlet toeing the lines of IMF infrastructure and
privatization schemes leading to single currency which by itself is non
sequester and entirely flawed if not hurtful to world markets – going by any
measure of economic theories – are so devised to enable both continents
continue good businesses which is not the required business format for
financial satellite systems for Africa and its third world economies, that
opposing such pamphlet may be suggesting an opposition to some hints of
financial colonialism which can be argued as the indirect motivation to seek
new avenues. But this is not the case, the idea of region balance sheet for
Africa and for several parts of world is no only faulty in its inception, it
perpetuates the wrong notions of economic triumph which is legal tender can
inaugurate and to a large extent, the pamphlets and their leading think-through
are not sufficient in enabling the requisite changes necessary in Africa in
general, or to be specific, in regions of Africa that require their own
economic satellite. It looks from all standpoint that new emphasis on African
markets and their exchange and buying power should be tolerated in many
sensitive areas of economic business such as those of ECOWAS and some other
good countries in Southern Africa led by South Africa. Perhaps the idea as a
rotunda or watering hole should place Egypt as part of the landscape in the
North, for if we compare the roles of Morocco and Egypt, we are at once at the
torching stones Asia and decided interest from North Africa. It is all in gum
thinking that it seems, that Nigerians in West Africa are neither concerned
about the structure of businesses in Africa or structure of business in the
world, that they are primarily concerned with survival making Nigeria by
default a highly consumptive economy where other Africans with enough
penetration capacity find their products and produce shipped even from South
Africa or flown daily through air, ravished and consumed in matter of days and
weeks. In the past, there are 34 airports in Nigeria, but in recent years many
of them were forced to fold, largely for problems of maintenance and
engineering which the balkanization of their local currency more than made
difficult. No doubt Ghana barely surviving in West Africa do not account for
the lack of materials in Ghana, their industrial revolution – making necessary
products easily available or manufacturing meeting and beating estimate over a
long period of time – has not taken full mobility. Worse than Ghana is Nigeria
that can only generally boast of major structural changes besides the buildings
which themselves were forced to erect due to very high demands of housing. It
is longing to consider that a place such as Lagos as some observers have said
were built by Nigerians – at least in the last half a century, lodging some of
the numbers available or comparable to other active cities in world. But like some of the countries that are
grouped as MINT, these countries do have a major city that experiences and
benefits from the most recent Government endeavors such a Mexico City that have
a expansion leading to 17 million people, that is a fifth of all Mexicans live
in Mexico City, which also means a reverting to partial equilibrium of a
certain measure, which in the end could suggest that the problems of these MINT
such as Mexico and Nigeria is the problem of equilibrium. Uneven development
with emphasis on one or two areas of business or nexus point in these
economies, such as Lagos Nigeria with about 17 million and with buildings
reaching into the Island, may mislead an observer on the economic prowess of
the nations. Perhaps he or she would travel to Abuja and see another vast
expansion of population comparable to Austin in growth in the last 20 years,
Abuja moved from 100 thousand people to 1.1 million and more in less 20 years,
all in spite of heavy cost used to welter the attention on the capital. Such
evidence is opulence in Port Harcourt, Rivers State and in parts of Ibadan in
Oyo, give in and out on what population can do any economy and there is need
for anchor.
The intent of nation builders has
never been to forge a state that live forever or have a people too familiar
with longevity of State such as Egypt and in mimesis Rome, speak of the
Foundations that will last 10 thousand years. Perhaps Egypt and its claim to history
reaching 100 thousand years, leaves much to be studied and desired concerning
the evolution of a super-power and whether or not it is possible to gauge the
age of this super power state from the corridors of politics or religion. Rome
is not Egypt, rank far below Phoenician which they destroyed in Cartage, rank
lower than Babylon, and in so far as the dominions of Persia and Assyria, Rome
belong up there but nowhere formidable. Macedonians have a titled history that
compares with Rome, their penetration into deeper areas of the world was
compared mainly to Mongols and their Genghis Khan. In rear light of more recent
stories, neither the French who no new comers to world business or the English
or the Dutch approached the territorial integrity of these nations before them,
including the long winded audacity of Islam who not only brought religion to
their areas of world but also their business. If Syria is considered of all of
the neighboring states to be link to Asia and Africa and Europe, attempts at taking
Syria occupied leaders of all meaning going as far as Jordan and Egyptians
whose obelisk are still found in several parts of that Peninsula. When the
Mongols arrived in parts of Syria, they were not bringing religion to these
cultures and people, they were interested in business and what the area could
generate for them. When the Nestorians took their possession and religions to
Turkey and into China, the religion survived but more than the religion, it was
the Silk Road to China that remained the connecting point between China and the
rest of the world. The comparison between Egypt as a super state separated from
the problems of the Middle East or at least meddled of slovenly into it, it
makes for the augment that the Amana letters where the Amurru and sheep hoards
paint a picture of Egypt and pharaoh whose help were solicited, for troubles in
these areas. Religion, people, politics and money are all part of the same
struggle and require some measure of discipline to have access to what it could
offer. Penetration to some parts of the world and Asia is a matter to be
discussed along the corridors of US policy in Syria, especially the long and
tedious relationship between Russia and the Arabs.
David Livingston traveling through
parts of Africa believed that the future of Africa was to be revived through
Christianity and Commerce, he wasn’t kidding, Livingston may have condemned
East Africa but he was passed on a gentle man missionary, and even in our
generation, some people consider this man who actions nearly mitigated against
a whole generation of Africans are a saint. It is an understanding that
emotions play into money but for all corners of world business and I for one,
have tried to argue, people can only resist the advantage of price only for so long.
If there was in Africa – even at the age of Slave trade – a market or a
national economic fronting that was similar to what was available in Europe,
the movement of resources would have shifted from Europe and the Americans or
Asia to this area of importance in Africa. Lack of stable African markets is one
of the abiding reasons why Slave trade endured, for if there was a stable
African economy, these war Moorish wars in Spain and the course of redemption
through labor under the Charles V, would not have materialized into Slave trade
or so long. It was convenience of trafficking people for money to a place that
was outside their means and ability that gave slave trade a whole century and
half, and when the end came for slave trade and for renegade European soldiers
who took interest in Gold in East Africa and diamonds in South Africa, that a
new and more confounding problems of easing European market through rapacious
African wealth took moral significance.
No comments:
Post a Comment